LITERARY CRITICISM ABOUT THEORETICAL CONCEPTS OF HISTORY
Abstract
Scientific novelty of the article is in an attempt to designate the reason of the negative influence of the “linguistic turn” in its postmodern kind on the norms of professional conduct and the goals of research in historical science. The author considers one of the reasons of it to be the incorrect use of literary criticism means for the interpretation of the concepts “historical theory” and “historic fact”. The development of historical science is impossible without its active interaction with the related disciplines. They should be scientific disciplines, but not the literary criticism. Modern interdisciplinary projects, especially those which have arisen on the basis of the “linguistic turn”, should certainly take into consideration that experience.
References
1. Барт Р. Система моды. Статьи по семиотике культуры. - М.: изд. им. Сабашниковых, 2003. - 441 с.
2. Ковальченко И.Д. Методы исторического исследования. - М.: Наука, 2003. - 486 с.
3. Копосов Н.Е. Как думают историки. - М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2001. - 326 с.
4. Лукиан Самосатский. Сочинения. Т-2. -СПб.: Алетейя, 2001. 538 с.
5. Мегилл А. Историческая эпистемология. - М.: Канон+: РООИ «Реабилитация», 2007. - 479 с.
6. Уайт Х. Метаистория. Историческое воображение в Европе XIX века. - Екатеринбург.: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2002. -528 с.
7. White H. Tropic of Discourse: Essay in Cultural Criticism. - L.; Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978. -178 p.
Review
Views:
62
Email this article 