Preview

Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and Political Sciences

Advanced search

THE PROBLEMS OF THE HISTORIAN’S LANGUAGE IN POSTMODERNISM

https://doi.org/ 10.18384/2310-676X-2018-4-45-54

Abstract

The article briefly analyzes the problem of correlation between historical and artistic comprehension of reality. The investigated aspect of the problem is the place and role of the language in historical research on the basis of the views of postmodernism representatives in the United States and Western European countries historiography of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. The theoretical basis for the analysis is the thesis of history as a science, and not a synthesis of scientific and artistic principles, and with the decisive role of the latter. Another basis for the analysis is the principle of objective knowledge, incompatible with the thesis of the pluralism of truths, as the norm of the results of cognition. The work briefly analyzes the views of individual postmodernism representatives, including Н. White, the most famous of them. The analysis of this problem has a creative and specific historical significance, including the field of teaching the university course "Theory and Methodology of History."

About the Authors

Nikolay I. Smolensky
Moscow Region State University
Russian Federation


Alexander N. Fuks
Moscow Region State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Вебер М. Избранные произведения. М.: Прогресс, 1990. 808 с.

2. Смоленский Н.И. О некоторых теоретико-методологических принципах исторической концепции Леопольда фон Ранке // Методологические и историографические вопросы исторической науки. Вып. 1. Томск: Томский ун-т, 1963. С. 137-167.

3. Смоленский Н.И. Категория объективности познания в немецкой буржуазной историографии XIX в. и теория «понимания» И.Г. Дройзена // Методологические и историографические вопросы исторической науки. Вып. 15. Томск: Томский ун-т, 1982. С. 58-77.

4. Смоленский Н.И. Политические категории немецкой буржуазной историографии (1848-1871 гг.). Томск: Томский ун-т, 1982. 214 с.

5. Смоленский Н.И. История и логика. Проблемы общеисторической теории и природы исторических понятий. М.: МГОУ, 2013. 184 с.

6. Соссюр Ф. Курс общей лингвистики. Екатеринбург: Уральский ун-т,1999. 432 с. С. 278.

7. Уайт Х. Метаистория (Историческое воображение в Европе XIX века). Екатеринбург: Уральский ун-т, 2002. 528 с.

8. Boeckh A. Enzyklopadie und Methodologie der philosophischen Wissenschaften. Zpz.: Hrgs. v. Bratuschek, 1877. 839 S.

9. White H. Metahistory: The Historical Imafination in Nineteen-Century Europe. Baltimore, 1973. 448 p.


Review

Views: 88


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5156 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5164 (Online)