Historical Education: Main Directions of Interpretation of the Phenomenon of Ethnocultural and Linguistic Diversity in Russia
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5164-2025-5-117-128
Abstract
Aim. To identificate trends in theoretical understanding and practical measures in modern Russia to preserve the metacultural paradigm of Russian civilization.
Methodology. The article analyzes regulatory and legislative acts, current scientific and journalistic materials, and regional practices in order to determine the achieved results in understanding the historical experience of interethnic interaction, in order to determine possible vectors for further education in light of the implementation of the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation «On the Strategy of the State National Policy of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2036.»
Results. The study identifies key formats for highlighting the contribution of individual peoples and the Russian people as a state-forming nation to the creation of Russian civilization.
Research implications. The results of the study can be used to prepare educational events and lectures aimed at developing a civilizational approach in history education, drawing on traditional Russian values.
About the Author
Е. V. Кriazheva-KartsevaRussian Federation
Еlena V. Кriazheva‐Kartseva – Cand. Sci. (History), Departmentally Head, Department of Russian History
Moscow
References
1. Martynova, N. V. & Slipetskaya, D. R. (2021). Folk art of Nanais is a national treasure of a small homeland in the ethnocultural education of children and adults of the Khabarovsk Territory. In: The Scientific Heritage, 71, 3–19 (in Russ.).
2. Fedorov, P. V. (2017). On the appearance of the Russian line in Lapland (in the footsteps of one discussion). In: Arctic and North, 26, 53–75. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2017.26.53 (in Russ.).
3. Glebova, E. V. (2020). Fish skin as a symbol of the ethnic culture and identity of the indigenous peoples of Nizhny Amur. In: Russia and the Asia-Pacific region. Ethnography and ethnology, 1, 169–181. DOI: 10.24411/1026-8804-2020-10013 (in Russ.).
4. Arutyunyan, K. A., Melkonyan, A. A. & Dadayan, E.V. (2025). Contribution of Armenian pilots to the Victory over fascism in the Great Patriotic War. In: RUDN Journal of Russian History 24-2, 161–172. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8674-2025-24-2-161-172 (in Russ.).
5. Baghdasaryan, V. A. (2025). The Great Patriotic War as a civilizational war: scientific and methodological recommendations for new history textbooks. In: RUDN Journal of Russian History, 2, 7–25. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5164-2025-2-7-25 (in Russ.).
6. Bezugolny, A. Yu. (2025). History of the Jewish national military unit project as part of the Red Army in 1942–1943. In: RUDN Journal of Russian History, 24-2, 173–188. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8674-2025-24-2-173-188 (in Russ.).
7. Leskova, I. V. & Zyazin, S. Yu. (2025). Ideas of state unity in the public discourse of Russia in the 20th – early 21st centuries. In: Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and Political Science, 1, 120–126. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5164-2025-1-120-126 (in Russ.).
8. Lysenko, Yu. A. & Gundova, O. E. (2025). Material stimulation as a practice of interaction between the Russian Empire and the Kazakh elite of the younger and middle zhuzes in the 18th – first half of the 19th centuries. In: RUDN Journal of Russian History, 24-3, 305–316. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8674-2025-24-3-305-316 (in Russ.).
9. Rezvushkina, S. A. (2025). Incessant Liturgy: Orthodox Anthropology in the Formation of Russian Civilizational Identity. In: Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and Political Science, 3, 37–49. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5164-2025-3-37-49 (in Russ.).
10. Rezvushkina, S. A. (2025). Intangible ethnocultural heritage of Russia as the basis of civilizational identity: challenges of constructivism and instrumentalism. In: Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and Political Science, 2, 67–76. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5164-2025-2-67-76 (in Russ.).
Review
JATS XML




















