Statistical approach to classification of the hammer-headed pins of the Early – Middle Bronze Age
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5164-2024-5-123-138
Abstract
Aim. To test the applicability of statistical methods to constructing a classification of hammer-headed pins of the Bronze Age.
Methodology. A sample of bone hammer-headed pins from the State Historical Museum was studied. A list of features that may be important in constructing a classification was compiled. The method of principal component analysis was tested and a description of its application was given.
Results. Metric and qualitative features characterizing hammer-headed pins have been developed. A database with information about the studied sample has been created. The applicability of statistical methods to constructing classifications of hammer-headed pins has been demonstrated.
Research implications. Some conclusions of the authors of the previous classifications have been statistically confirmed. Preliminary types of pins suitable for constructing a new classification in the course of further analysis have been identified.
About the Author
I. A. Stepanov
State Academic University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Stepanov – Master’s Degree Student,
Maronovsky pereulok 26, Moscow 119049
References
1. Vas’ko D. S., Kolosov V. P. [Peliks of the Kerch style from the collection of the State Hermitage Museum. An experience of statistical analysis]. In: Khrshanovsky V. A. et al., eds. Bosporskiy fenomen. Bosporskoye tsarstvo V. I. Rostovtseva (vzglyad iz XXI veka). CH. 2 [Bosporan phenomenon. Bosporan kingdom of M. I. Rostovtsev (a view from the 21st century). Part 2]. St. Peterburg, IPC SPb-GUPTD Publ., 2020, pp. 210–215.
2. Gey A. N. Novotitorovskaya kultura [Novotitorovskaya culture]. Moscow, Stary Sad Publ., 2000. 223 p.
3. Kazarnizki A. A., Panasyuk N. V. [Craniology and archeology of the East Manych catacomb culture – perspectives of the analysis of the consistency of signs]. In: Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Vseobshchaya istoriya [RUDN Journal of World History], 2018, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 250–260.
4. Kiyashko V. Ya. [On the issue of hammer-shaped pins]. In: Kiyashko V. Ya., Maksimenko V. Ye., eds. Donskiye drevnosti Vyp. 1 [Donskie drevnostiyu Vol. 1]. Azov, Azovsky polygraphist Publ., 1992, pp. 4–57.
5. Kovaleva L. G. [Hammer-shaped pins of the Northern Black Sea region]. In: Gavrilov A. V., ed. Problemy arkheologii Severnogo Prichernomorya [Problems of archeology of the Northern Black Sea region]. Kherson, 1991, pp. 26–34.
6. Latynin B. A. [Hammer-shaped pins, their cultural attribution and dating]. In: Arkheologicheskiy sbornik Gosudarstvennogo Ermitazha. Vip. 9 [Archaeological collection of the State Hermitage. Vol. 9]. Leningrad, Sov. Artist Publ., 1967, pp. 5–96.
7. Nechitailo A. L. Verkhneye Prikubanye v bronzovom veke [Upper Kuban Region in the Bronze Age]. Kyiv, Naukova Dumka, 1978. 151 p.
8. Nikolaeva N. A. [On the linguistic-cultural attribution and semantics of “two-hammer bone pins” (based on excavations in Kalmykia)]. In: Byulleten KalmNTS RAN [Bulletin of the Kalmyk Scientific Center of the RAS], 2019, no. 4, pp. 151–169.
9. Nikolaeva N. A., Safronov V. A. [The origin of bone hammer-shaped pins]. In: KIA [KSIA], 1975, iss. 142, pp. 11–17.
10. Safronov V. A. [Classification of Ciscaucasian Bone Hammer-Shaped Pins]. In: KIA [KSIA], 1973, iss. 134, pp. 42–47.
11. Fedorov-Davydov G. A. Statisticheskiye metody v arkheologii [Statistical Methods in Archaeology]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1987. 215 p.
12. Kholyushkin Yu. P., Vityaev E. E., Kostin V. S. [Problems of Archaeology and Methods of Their Solution]. In: Informatsionnyye tekhnologii v gumanitarnykh issledovaniyakh [Information Technologies in Humanitarian Research], 2013, iss. 18, pp. 3–97.
13. Shishlina N. I. Severo-Zapadnyy Prikaspiy v epokhu bronzy (V–III tys. do n. e.) [Northwestern Caspian Region in the Bronze Age (5th–3rd Millennia BC)]. Moscow, GIM Publ., 2007. 400 p.
Review
Views:
38
Email this article 