Arian migration: new facts and analysis
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5164-2024-5-39-63
Abstract
Aim. To study the processes of formation and migration of the Sayan archaeological complex in the III millennium BC based on Okunev archaeological culture. To identify the influence of Sayan migration to South Asia as a factor in the formation of cultural and ideological processes in the Harappan civilization.
Methodology. A stylistic and typological analysis of images of both statuary and petroglyphs has been carried out as a special type of communication within society, capable of conveying the foundations of an ancient worldview. Comparative typological, comparative cultural and comparative historical methods are used in the work, the method of analysis and synthesis is applied.
Results. It has been established that Okunev migration to the south is a fact that indicates the transfer of their worldview foundations to the environment of the late Harappan population. The innovative processes that are fixed in the glyptics and art of the late Harappa are directly related to the arrival of the Okunev population. The influence of Okunev’s worldview can be identified in the structural correspondences between Okunev’s realities and their reflection in the hymns of the Rigveda, in glyptics and the art of Harappa.
Research implications. The work proves that Sayan migration belongs to the elite type of migration and does not show signs of invasion. In the process of adaptation, the aliens transfer their cultural potential, including language, worldview, rituals and social structure to the local population.
About the Author
L. A. SokolovaRussian Federation
Lyudmila A. Sokolova – Cand Sci (History), Researcher,
ul. Dmitriya Ulianova 19, Moscow 19117292
References
1. Vadetskaya E. B. [Siberian incense burners]. In: KIA [KSIA], 1986, vol. 185, pp. 50–59.
2. Gromov A. V. [Origin and connections of the Okunevsky population of the Minusinsk Basin]. In: Savinov D. G., Podolsky M. L., eds. Okunevskiy sbornik [Okunevsky collection]. St. Petersburg, 1997, pp. 301–345.
3. Devlet M. A. Petroglify Mugur-Sargola [Petroglyphs of Mugur-Sargol]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980. 271 p.
4. Elizarenkova T. Ya., Toporov V. N. [The world of things according to the Rigveda]. In: Elizarenkova T. Ya., ed. Rigveda [Rigveda. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1999, p. 509.
5. Elizarenkova T. Ya. Istoriya i kultura Drevney Indii [History and Culture of Ancient India]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1990. 12 p.
6. Zaika A. L. [Faces in the Rock Art of the Lower Angara]. In: Arkheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Yevrazii [Archeology, Ethnography and Anthropology of Eurasia], 2012, no. 1, pp. 62–76.
7. Zyablin L. P. [Neolithic settlement Unyuk on the Upper Yenisei]. In: Smirnov A. P., ed. Problemy arkheologii Urala i Sibiri [Problems of archeology of the Urals and Siberia]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973, pp. 65–73.
8. Kyzlasov L. R. Drevneyshaya Khakasiya [Ancient Khakassia]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1986. 295 p.
9. Kubarev V. D. Pamyatniki Karakolskoy kultury Altaya [Monuments of the Karakol culture of Altai]. Novosibirsk, 2010. 262 p.
10. Leontiev N. V. [Stele from the Askiz River (the image of a male deity in Okunev fine art)]. In: Savinov D. G., Podolsky M. L., Nagler A., Chugunov K. V., eds. Okunevskiy sbornik-2. Kultura i yeye okruzheniye [Okunev collection-2. Culture and its environment]. St. Petersburg, 2006, pp. 222–236.
11. Lipskiy A. N., Vadetskaya E. B. [Burial ground Tas-Khazaa]. In: Savinov D. G., Podolskiy M. L., Nagler A., Chugunov K. V., eds. Okunevskiy sbornik-2. Kultura i yeye okruzheniye [Okunevskiy sbornik-2. Culture and its environment]. St. Petersburg, 2006, pp. 9–52.
12. Mackay E. The most ancient culture of the Indus Valley (Rus. ed.: Grakova-Sviridova M. B., transl. Drevney kulturnaya dolina Inda. Moscow, Izd-vo inostr. lit-ry Publ., 1951. 180 p.)
13. Machinskiy D. A. [Unique sacred center of the 3rd – middle of the 1st millennium BC in the Khakas-Minusinsk Basin]. In: Savinov D. G., Podolsky M. L., eds. Okunevskiy sbornik. Kul'tura, iskusstvo, antropologiya [Okunev collection. Culture, art, anthropology]. St. Petersburg, 1997, pp. 265–287.
14. Meletinsky E. M. Proiskhozhdeniye geroicheskoy eposa: ranniye formy i arkhaichnyye pamyatniki [The Origin of the Heroic Epic: Early Forms and Archaic Monuments]. Moscow, Vost. lit. RAN Publ., 2004. 460 p.
15. Miklashevich E. A. [Okunev Horses: On the Problem of the Appearance of the Domesticated Horse in Southern Siberia]. In: Savinov D. G., Podolskiy M. L., Nagler A., Chugunov K. V., eds. Okunevskiy sbornik-2. Kultura i yeye okruzheniye [Okunevskiy sbornik-2. Culture and its environment]. St. Petersburg, 2006, pp. 191–211.
16. Okladnikov A. P. Drevneye iskusstvo Priamurya. Albom [Ancient Art of the Amur Region. Album]. Leningrad, Avrora Publ., 1981. 159 p.
17. Podolsky M. L. [On the ideological features of the Siberian fine art of the Bronze Age (Okunev masks). In: Lvova E. L., ed. Mirovozzreniye narodov Sibiri po arkheologicheskim i etnograficheskim dannym [Worldview of the peoples of Western Siberia based on archaeological and ethnographic data]. Tomsk, 1985, pp. 111–114.
18. Podolsky N. L. [On the principles of dating rock art. Regarding the book by A. A. Formozov "Essays on primitive art"]. In: Sovetskaya arkheologiya [Soviet archeology], 1973, no. 3, pp. 265–276.
19. Sokolova L. A. [Multicomponent nature in the Okunev cultural tradition]. In: Derevyanko A. P., Molodin V. I., eds. Materialy Vserossiyskogo arkheologicheskogo syezda. T. 1 [Proceedings of the All-Russian Archaeological Congress. Vol. 1]. Novosibirsk, 2006, pp. 464–467.
20. Sokolova L. A. [Okunevskaya cultural tradition in the stratigraphic aspect]. In: Arkheologiya, antropologiya i etnografiya Yevrazii [Archaeology, anthropology and ethnography of Eurasia], 2007, no. 2, pp. 41–51.
21. Bruneau L., Bellezza J. V. The Rock Art of Upper Tibet and Ladakh – Inner Asian cultural adaptation, regional differentiation and the ‘Western Tibetan Plateau Style’. In: Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines, 2013, no. 28, pp. 5–161.
22. Jettmar K. Between Gandhära and the silk roads: Rock-carvings along the Karakorum highway. London, 1987. 60 р.
23. Kalhoro Z. A. The discovery of Rock Painting in Sindh. In: Journal of the Pakistan History Society, 2014, vol. LXII, no. 3, pp. 73–90.
24. Rau W. Ist Vediche Arhaologie meglish?' In: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, Supplement III, 1 (XIX Deutsche Orientalistentag). Wiesbaden. 1977. S.L. XXXIII-C.P.