The phenomenon of dual power in Russia 1917 in English-language historiography
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2023-1-123-134
Abstract
Aim. To analyze the explanation presented in English-language historiography of the political dual power phenomenon that developed in Russia in 1917, summarizing and comparing the positions of various scientific directions.
Methodology. Based on the comparative historical method and the principles of objectivism and historicism, to investigate the concepts presented in foreign historiography of the causes of the emergence and evolution of political dual power in Russia in 1917.
Results. The author compares points of view and approaches to the problem of the dual power phenomenon in Russia in 1917 of two main English scientific directions – “totalitarian” and “revisionist”.
Their differences and similarities in the issues of the reasons for the appearance, content, and chronology of dual power in Russia in 1917 are revealed.
Research implications. The analysis of English-language studies (“totalitarian” and “revisionist” scientific directions) devoted to the problems of the organization of power in 1917 makes it possible to compare the points of view of representatives of various scientific directions, which in turn makes it possible to eliminate the discrepancy in the concept of “dual power”, to give a chronology of its evolution and to present historiography on this topic in full.
About the Author
N. A. YakovlevRussian Federation
Nikolai A. Yakovlev – Postgraduate student, Department of the History of Russia of the Middle Ages and the New Age
ul. Very Voloshinoi 24, Mytishchi 141014, Moscow region
References
1. Arendt Ch. On Revolution (Rus. ed.: Kosich I., transl. O revolyuzii. Moscow, Europe Publ., 2011. 456 p.)
2. Aron R. Dimensions de la conscience historique (Rus. ed.: Gobozov I. A., transl. Izbrannoe: Izmereniya istoricheskogo soznaniya. Moscow, Progress Publ., 2004. 527 p.)
3. Miller A., Cherny D., eds. Goroda v imperii v godyu Velikoi voiny i revoluzii [Cities of the Empire during the Great War and Revolution: Collection of articles]. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2017. 520 p.
4. Brenton T., ed. Historically inevitable? Turning points of Russian revolution (Rus. ed.: Vinogradova L., transl. Istoricheskaya neisbezhnost? Klyuchevye sobytiya russkoi revoluzii. Moscow, Alpina nonfiction Publ., 2017. 414 p.)
5. Karr E. The History of Soviet Russia. Book 1. The Bolshevik Revolution. 1917–1923 (Rus. ed.: Nenarokov A.P., transl. Istoriya Sovetskoi Rossii Kn. 1. Bolshevistskaya revoluziya 1917–1923. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. 771 p.)
6. Lieven D. Towards the flame. Empire, war and the end of Tsarist Russia (Rus. ed.: Bavina P. S., transl. Navstrechu ognyu. Imperiya, voina I konez zarskoi Rossii. Moscow, Politicheskaya Encyclopedia Publ., 2017. 431 p.)
7. Malia M. Lokomotivy istorii: Revoluzii I stanovlenie sovremennogo mira [History’s Locomotives: Revolutions and the Making of the Modern World]. Moscow, Politicheskaya Encyclopedia Publ., 2015. 405 p.
8. Malia M. Sovetskaya tragediya: Istoriya sozialisma v Rossii 1917–1991 [The Soviet Tragedy: A History of Socialism in Russia 1917–1991]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2002. 584 p.
9. Paips R. Russkaya revoluziya. Kn. 1. Agoniya starogo rezhima (1905–1917) [The Russian Revolution. Book 1. The Agony of the Old regime (1905–1917)]. Moscow, Zacharov Publ., 2005. 480 p.
10. Paips R. Russkaya revoluziya. Kn. 2. Bolsheviki v borbe za vlast (1917–1918) [The Russian Revolution. Book 2. The Bolsheviks in the struggle for power (1917–1918)]. Moscow, Zacharov Publ., 2005. 720 p.
11. Rabinovich A. Bolsheviki prihodyat k vlasti: Revoluziya 1917 goda v Petrograde [The Bolsheviks come to power: The 1917 Revolution in Petrograd]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989. 416 p.
12. Raleigh D. Saratov province in 1917: events, parties, people (Rus. ed.: Bazyleva M., transl. Saratovskaya guberniya v 1917 godu: sobatiya, partii, lyudi. Saratov, College Publ., 1994. 120 p.)
13. Trotsky L. Sochineniya. T. 3. 1917. Ch. 1. Ot Fevralya do Oktyabrya [Works. Vol. 3. 1917. Part 1. From February to October.]. Moscow; Leningrad, 1924. 466 p.
14. Ulam A. B. The Bolsheviks (Rus. ed.: Igorevsky L. A., transl. Bolsheviki: prichiny I posledstviya perevorota 1917 goda. Moscow, Tsentrpoligraf Publ., 2004. 510 p.)
15. Kalashnikov V. V., ed. Fevralskaya revoluziya 1917 goda: problemi istorii i istoriografii [The February Revolution of 1917: problems of History and historiography]. St. Petersburg, SPbSETU «LETI» Publ., 2017. 380 p.
16. Fitzpatrick Sh. The Russian Revolution (Rus. ed.: Edelman N., transl. Russkaya revoluziya. Moscow, Izd-vo Instituta Gaidara Publ., 2018. 320 p.)
17. Figes O. A people’s Tragedy: The Russian Revolution 1891–1924. London, Pimlico Publ., 1996. 923 p.
18. Haimson L, Petruha R. Two strike waves in Imperial Russia. In: Strikes, Wars and Revolution in an International Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 101−166.