Evaluation of the works of M. N. Pokrovsky in soviet historiography of the second half of the 60s – early 90s of the 20th century
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2023-1-115-122
Abstract
Aim. To examine the views on the works of M. N. Pokrovsky of the Soviet period of the second half of the 1960s – early 1990s; to highlight the key features of the evaluation of M. N. Pokrovsky’s work in this period.
Methodology. The main content of the study is the materials of a comparative analysis of the assessments of M. N. Pokrovsky’s creativity in historical science of the second half of the 60s – early 90s of the 20th century.
Results. Based on the results of the study, the author concludes about the transformations of M. N. Pokrovsky’s works’ assessments in historical science during the period under study, the reasons for these transformations are revealed.
Research implications. The research materials can be used by specialists in the field of historiography, as well as by school teachers in preparation for lessons.
About the Author
E. V. Gres
Moscow Region State Рedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeny V. Gres – Postgraduate student, Department of Methods of Teaching History, Political Science and Law
ul. Very Voloshinoi 24, Mytishchi 141014, Moscow Region
References
1. Artizov A. N. [M. N. Pokrovsky as a historian of domestic historical science]. In: Istoriya SSSR [History of the USSR], 1985, no. 2, pp. 112–118.
2. Govorkov A. A. Pokrovskiy o predmete zarazheniya nauki [M. N. Pokrovsky on the subject of historical science]. Tomsk, Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta Publ., 1976. 263 p.
3. Gorodetsky E. N. Sovetskaya istoriografiya Velikogo Oktyabrya. 1917 – seredina 30-kh godov [Soviet historiography of the Great October Revolution. 1917 – mid 30s]. Mscow, Nauka Publ., 1981. 367 p.
4. Gukovsky A. I. [How «Russian history with the teachers of the times» by M. N. Pokrovsky was created]. In: Voprosy istorii [Questions of history], 1968, no. 9, pp. 130–142.
5. Gukovsky A. I. [Controversial issues of Soviet archeography]. In: Voprosy istorii [Questions of history], 1966, no. 5, pp. 65–76.
6. Dubrovsky S. M. [Academician M. N. Pokrovsky and his role in the development of Soviet historical science]. In: Voprosy istorii [Questions of history], 1962, no. 3, pp. 3–31.
7. Dubrovsky S. M. [M. N. Pokrovsky and his role in the Marxist development of the history of Russia]. In: Nechkina M. V., ed. Ocherki istorii istoricheskoy nauki v SSSR. T. III [Essays on the history of historical science in the USSR. Vol. III. Moscow, Izd-vo AN SSSR Publ., 1963, pp. 218–236.
8. Kagarlitsky B. Yu. [The clue to the sphinx. The Forgotten History of Mikhail Pokrovsky]. In: Russkaya zhizn [Russian Life], 2008, no. 3, pp. 98–102.
9. Kizevetter A. [The reign of Alexander I in a new light]. In: Russkaya mysl [Russian Thought], 1908, book I–II, pp. 99–118.
10. Kogonashvili K. K. Pedagogicheskaya deyatelnost i istoriko-metodicheskiye vzglyady M. N. Pokrovskogo: avtoref. dis. … kand. ped. nauk [Pedagogical activity and historical and methodological views of M. N. Pokrovsky: Cand. Sci. thesis in Pedagogic sciences]. Moscow, 1969. 20 p.
11. Sokolov O. D. Pokrovskiy i sovetskaya istoricheskaya nauka [M. N. Pokrovsky and Soviet historical science]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1970. 276 p.
12. Fuchs A. N. [“Russian history in the most concise essay” by M. N. Pokrovsky as a historiographic source]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i politicheskiye nauki [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: History and political sciences], 2010, no. 3, pp. 13–21.
13. Cherepnin L. V. Ocherki istorii istoricheskoy nauki v SSSR. T. IV [Essays on the history of historical science in the USSR. Vol. IV]. Moscow, 1966, pp. 180–198.
14. Chernobaev A. A. [M. N. Pokrovsky – scientist and revolutionary]. In: Voprosy istorii [Questions of history], 1988, no. 8, pp. 3–23.
Review
Views:
190
Email this article 