Post-soviet socio-cultural space in theory and politics of modern Russia
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2023-1-67-74
Abstract
Aim. To analyze the phenomenon of socio-cultural identity.
Methodology. The methods of theoretical analysis, observation, generalization, interpretation of the results were used in the study.
Results. In the article, the author explores the actualized phenomenon of socio-cultural identity. The problem seems to be quite timely from the viewpoint of both methodological “armament” in a concrete historical study and the development of approaches to assessing the prospects for its development in the modern social process. In the post-Soviet space, the socio-cultural factor is becoming quite a competitive instrument of integration and is increasing the potential for the formation of a new world order in general and integration associations in particular.
Research implications. The results of the research contribute to the theoretical understanding of the socio-cultural space concept and allow us to propose the author’s interpretation.
About the Author
L. S. Petrik
Moscow Region State Рedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lilia S. Petrik – External Postgraduate Student, Department of Recent History of Russia
ul. Very Voloshinoi 24, Mytishchi 141014, Moscow Region
References
1. Badmaev V. N., Khutyz Z. A. Post-Soviet socio-cultural space as a cultural-identification integrator]. In: Vestnik Maykopskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Maikop State Technological University], 2014, no. 2, pp. 19–22.
2. Baydarov E. U. Problems of the dichotomy «West-East», «East-West» in global studies]. In: Credo New, 2007, no. 4, pp. 9.
3. Brzezinski Z. [Balance the East, renew the West]. In: Rossiya v globalnoy politike [Russia in global affairs], 2012, no. 1, pp. 35–37.
4. Egorov V. G., Savina O. V. [General cultural and civilizational basis a factor in the reintegration of the post-Soviet community]. In: Obozrevatel-Observer [Obozrevatel-Observer], 2012, no. 12, pp. 42–50.
5. Ishchenko N. S. [The Problems of theoretical comprehension of sociocultural transformations]. In: Filosofsko-kulturologicheskiye issledovaniya [Philosophical and cultural studies]. Abstract at: http://fki.lgaki.info/2018/10/01/проблемы-теоретического-осмысления/ (accessed: 02.12.2022).
6. Kolinko I. V. [Sociological foundations for the development of socio-cultural space]. In: Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and practice of social development], 2005, no. 3, pp. 12–13.
7. Rakitov A. I. [A new approach to the relationship of history, information and culture: the example of Russia]. In: Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 1991, no. 4, pp. 24–25.
8. Rekk D. A., Egorov V. G. Klany v postsovetskoy Tsentral’noy Azii [Clans in Post-Soviet Central Asia]. St. Petersburg, Aletheia Publ., 2022. 198 p.
9. Sorokin P. A. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Man. Civilization. Society]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1992. 543 p.
10. Tsukerman V. S. [Unified socio-cultural environment: treatment aspects]. In: Vestnik Chelyabinskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii kultury i iskusstv [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Academy of Culture and Arts], 2009, no. 2 (18), pp. 49–55.
11. Chesnokov V. F., William L. [Pitirim Sorokin: social stratification and social mobility]. In: Chelovek, soobshchestvo, upravleniye [Man, community, management], 2007, no. 1, pp. 116–117.
12. Ashley R. K. [Political realism and human interests]. In: Yezhekvartalnyy zhurnal mezhdunarodnykh issledovaniy [Quarterly Journal of International Studies], 1981, vol. 25, iss. 2, pp. 204–236.
13. Warner W. L., Meeker M., Eells K. Social Class in America: f Manual of Procedure for the Measurement of Social Status. Chicago, Science Research Associates. 1949. 298 p.
Review
Views:
155
Email this article 