IDEOLOGICAL ORIGINS OF THE THEORY OF OFFICIAL NATIONALITY: HISTORIOGRAPHICAL ASPECT
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2022-3-113-120
Abstract
Aim. To identify the features of the reflection of the problems of the ideological origins of the official nationality theory in historiography.
Methodology. The author conducted the comprehensive analysis of historiographical sources that highlight the issue of the emergence of the theory of official nationality in relation to the characteristics of the historical context of the Russian Empire, in which the views of future adherents of this theory were formed. As the main methods of historical research the author used ideographic, historical-genetic, typological and comparative-historical methods.
Results. In the course of studying historical works devoted to the question of the emergence of the official nationality theory, it was possible to establish the dependence of the change of scientific paradigms in the study of intellectual and historical phenomena on the prevailing ideological and political background of the era. In addition, a significant difference between the interpretations and assessments of the genesis of the theory in pre-revolutionary, Soviet and post-Soviet historiographies was revealed. It was also established that historians pay much attention not to the political, but rather to the ideological origins of the theory of official nationality. This naturally encourages us to continue our research into this most interesting phenomenon of Russian socio-political and religious-philosophical thought.
Research implications. The data presented in this article and the results obtained are the basis for new research in the field of the history of Russian social thought and Russian historical science.
About the Author
A. Ilyin
Moscow Region State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey A. Ilyin – Senior Lecturer, Postgraduate Student, Department of Russian History of the Middle Ages and Modern Times
141014, Moscow Region, Mytishchi, ul. Very Voloshinoi 24
References
1. Bokhanov A. N. Samoderzhaviye. Ideya tsarskoy vlasti. [Autocracy. The idea of tsarist power]. Moscow, Russkoe slovo Publ., 2002. 349 p.
2. Vlasov V. A. [“Guardian of the Russian-self Count Sergei Semyonovich Uvarov”]. In: Izvestiya Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. G. Belinskogo [News of Penza State Pedagogical University named after V. G. Belinsky], 2008, no. 13, pp. 83–88.
3. Gavrilov I. B. [To the characteristic of S.S. Uvarov’s philosophy of education]. In: Khristianskoye chteniye [Christian reading], 2019, no. 5, pp. 161–173.
4. Gavrilov I. B. [Sergey Semyonovich Uvarov: Life. Works. Worldview]. In: Trudy kafedry bogosloviya Peterburgskoy dukhovnoy akademii [Proceedings of the Department of Theology of the St. Petersburg Theological Academy], 2019, no. 2 (4), pp. 131–191.
5. Nechkina M. V., ed. Istoriya SSSR. Tom II. Rossiya v XIX veke [History of the USSR. Volume II. Russia in the 19th century]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ., 1954. 848 p.
6. Collins R. Sociology of philosophies (Rus ed.: Rozov N. S., transl. Sotsiologiya filosofiy. Novosibirsk, Sibirskii khronograf Publ., 2002. 1280 p.).
7. Lenin V. I. Uderzhat li bolsheviki gosudarstvennuyu vlast [Will the Bolsheviks retain state power]. Leningrad, Gosizdat Publ., 1925. 67 p.
8. Papayani F. A. [Present-day interpretations of Uvarov triad]. In: Uchonyye zapiski Krymskogo federalnogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Filosofiya. Politologiya. Kulturologiya [Scientific notes of the Crimean Federal University named after V. I. Vernadsky. Philosophy. Political science. Cultural studies], 2018, vol. 4 (70), no. 2, pp. 26–37.
9. Tyapin I. N. [The problem of historical continuity in the philosophy of S. S. Uvarov]. In: Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina. Filosofiya [Bulletin of Leningrad State University named after A. S. Pushkin. Philosophy], 2018, no. 1, pp. 40–50.
Review
Views:
309
Email this article 