World War II in the space of actual politics and historical memory: to the 80th anniversary of the Victory of the Soviet Union (Round Table)

Aim. The article is devoted to the analysis of methodological, didactic and ideological challenges associated with the study and teaching of the history of the Second World War in the modern information and political context. Special attention is paid to the problems of preserving historical truth, countering falsifications, as well as the role of education in shaping national memory and identity.
Methodology. The research is based on comparative historical and discursive analysis, as well as on the study of domestic and foreign educational materials, scientific publications and public statements. The authors apply an interdisciplinary approach combining historiographical analysis, political science expertise and pedagogical assessment.
Results. The key challenges faced by historical science and education have been identified: the methodological crisis in the context of information warfare, the politicization of historical language, ethical difficulties in teaching in the current political narrative, and the need to update pedagogical approaches. Using the Battle of Stalingrad as an example, differences in national historical narratives are shown. This article analyzes Western liberal interpretations of the Second World War, aiming to revise the role of the USSR and equate the Soviet regime with Nazi Germany.
Research implication. This work contributes to the development of historical research methods in the digital era and suggests ways to modernize history education and teacher training. The findings can be applied to educational programs, popular science content creation, and strategies for protecting historical memory against hybrid threats.

1. Hastings, M. (2004). Armageddon: the battle for Germany, 1944–1945. New York.

2. Hayek, F. A. (2005). The Road to Serfdom. Moscow: Novoe Izdatelstvo Publ. (in Russ.).

3. Ebeling, R. M. How Stalin Used Hitler To Start World War II. Availible at: https://capitalismmagazine.com/2016/05/how-stalin-used-hitler-to-start-world-war-ii/ (accessed: 23.09.2025) (in Russ.)

4. Narochnitskaya, N. A. (2016). For what and with whom we fought. Moscow: Veche Publ. (in Russ.).

5. Kulish, V. M. (1971). History of the second front. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (in Russ.).

6. Sakharov, A. N., ed. (2002). History and historians, 2002: Historiographic bulletin. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (in Russ.).

7. Yakovlev, A. N. (2001). Bolshevism – social disease of the 20th century. In: Courtois, S., Vert, N., Panne, Zh-L., Pachkovsky, A., etc. Black Book of Communism. Crimes, terror, repression. Moscow: Tre veka istorii Publ., 5–32 (in Russ.).

8. Semchenko, A. (2025). Fourth Reich. Stalin trial. Moscow: Tion Publ. (in Russ.).

9. Petrushko, V. I. (1998). Autocephalist schisms in Ukraine in the post-Soviet period 1989–1997. Moscow: Sv.-Tikhonovsky theological institute Publ. (in Russ.).

10. Pidgayko, V. G. (2010). Bishop of Vladimir-Volyn and Kovel Manuel (Tarnavsky) in the history of Ukrainian church divisions of 1941–1943. In: Bulletin of church history, ¾, 303–322 (in Russ.).