The Distribution of the Practice of Artificial Cranial Deformation Among the Ancient Populations of Moldova and Armenia

Aim. To provide a systematic description of the phenomenon of artificial cranial modification.

Methodology. To achieve this goal, data on cases of artificial cranial deformation from the territories of Moldova and Armenia were collected and classified in order to identify their semantic unity. The methodological basis of the work relies on an integrated approach that combines anthropological and archaeological methods of analysis. To study the phenomenon of artificial modification of the skull, morphological and comparative typological methods were used aimed at identifying the forms, degree of expression and deformation techniques. Analysis of morphological features was carried out according to generally accepted classifications (classification of E. V. Zhirov.). When interpreting the data obtained, the archaeological context was taken into account - chronology, cultural affiliation and features of the funeral rite. Comparison of materials from Moldova and Armenia made it possible to trace regional features and possible cultural relationships in the practice of artificial head deformation.

Results. Skeletal remains of 220 individuals from the ancient burial grounds of Shirak were examined for traces of artificial cranial deformation. The Bokani series comprises two skulls. Comparison of deformation types with the chronological dynamics of early and late cultural complexes demonstrated that the fronto-occipital deformation was the most common form in both Moldova and Armenia. It is suggested that this practice may have served as a means of physically distinguishing the individuals who bore it from others.

Research implications. Systematization of data on the distribution of artificial cranial deformation contributes to understanding cultural continuity and interaction among contemporaneous societies and reflects the migratory processes of ancient populations.

1. Chippaux, C. (1982). Societes et mutilations ethniques. In: Bulletins et Mémoires de la Sociétéd` anthropologie de Paris, 9, 257–265.

2. Khudaverdyan, A. Yu. (2016). Artificial Deformation of Skulls from Bronze Age and Iron Age Armenia. In: Mankind Quarterly, 56-4, 513–534. DOI: 10.46469/mq.2016.56.4.2

3. Little, M. A., Galvin, K. A. & Mugambi, M. (1983). Cross-sectional growth of nomadic Turkana pastoralists. In: Human Biology, 55, 811–830.

4. Louhivuori, M. (2010). Understanding Neolithic Southern Levant: Case Studies of Archaeological Semiosis in Action. ABO: ABO Akademi University press.

5. Tavartkiladze, N., LaliashvIli, Sh., Khudaverdyan, A. & Ringbauer, H. (2025). Artificial Cranial Deformation Practices in the South Caucasus: An Anthropological Review. In: VII International Congress of Caucasologists Caucasus: Interdisciplinary Studies. Languages, peoples, cultures, genetic research. Tbilisi, 9.

6. Daems, A. & Croucher, K. (2007). Artificial cranial modification in prehistoric Iran: Evidence from crania and figurines. In: Iranica Antiqua, 42, 1–21. DOI: 10.2143/IA.42.0.2017868

7. Mayall1, P., Pilbrow V. & Bitadze, L. (2017). Migrating Huns and modified heads: Eigenshape analysis comparing intentionally modified crania from Hungary and Georgia in the Migration Period of Europe. In: PLoS ONE, 12, e0171064. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171064

8. Özbek, M. (2001). Cranial deformation in a subadult sample from Degirmentepe (Chalcolithic, Turkey). In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 115, 238–244. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1078

9. Khokhlov, A. A. (2006). Skulls with artificial deformation of the Bronze Age of the Volga-Ural region. In: OPUS: Interdisciplinary research in archeology. Iss. 5. Moscow: IA RAS, 47–52 (in Russ.).

10. Firshtein, B. V. (1970). Sarmatians of the Lower Volga region in anthropological lighting. In: Tot, T. A. & Firshtein, B. V. Anthropological data on the great migration of peoples. Avars and Sarmatians. Leningrad: Science Publ., 69–201 (in Russ.).

11. Dubova, N. A. (2006). Artificial deformation of the head in farmers of the Bronze Age. In: OPUS: Interdisciplinary Studies in Archaeology. Iss. 5. Moscow: IA RAS, 22–36 (in Russ.).

12. Khojayov, T. K. (2006). Geography and chronology of deliberate head deformation in Central Asia. In: OPUS: Interdisciplinary research in archeology. Iss. 5. M.: IA RAS, 12–21 (in Russ.).

13. Khudaverdyan, A. Yu., Yengibaryan, A. A., Matevosyan, R. Sh., Aleksanyan, N. G. & Khachatryan, A. A. (2021). The physical type of the population of the Armenian Highlands in the era antichnos ti (according to osteometric materials of urban and rural settlements). In: Bulletin of archeology, anthropology and ethnography, 1, 118–131. DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2021-52-1-11 (in Russ.).

14. Kasimova, R. M. (1960). Anthropological study of skulls from Mingachevir. Baku: Academy of Sciences of the Azerbaijan SSR (in Russ.).

15. Kirichenko, D. A. (2015). Sarmata of Romania according to anthropology. In: Bulletin of archeology, anthropology and ethnography, 1, 89–97 (in Russ.).

16. Miriţoiu N. Arhitectura craniană şi deformarea artificială intenţionată a craniului: Teză de doctorat. Bucureşti, 2006. 413 р.

17. Bereczki Zs., Marcsik A. Artificial cranial deformation in Hungary // Artificial deformation of human head in Eurasian past // OPUS: Interdisciplinary Investigation in Archaeology. Moscow: Institute of Archaeology RAS, 2006. Vol. 5. Р. 96–114.

18. Hippocrates. Selected books. About air waters and localities. M., 1994. S. 275-307 (in Russ.).

19. Ujfalvy, Ch. De. (1898). Memoire sur les Huns Blanks. In: L’Anthropologie, IX, 3-4, 392–395.

20. Sarianidi, V. I. (1989). Temple and necropolis of Tillyatepe. Moscow (in Russ.).

21. Harutyunov, S. A. (1985). Innovations in the culture of the ethnic group and their socio-economic conditioning. In: Ethnographic studies of the development of culture. Moscow, 31–49 (in Russ.).