Formation of the Historical School of the Moscow Regional Pedagogical Institute in the 1930s to 1950s
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5164-2025-4-38-53
Abstract
Aim. To identify the historiographical situation at the Moscow Regional Pedagogical Institute in the 1930s – early 1950s based on an analysis of the personalities of historians representing the institution and their scholarly contributions.
Methodology. The study involved an analysis of archival documents, including previously unpublished materials from the funds of the State University of Education, as well as an examination of scientific publications, lecture materials, and memoirs of faculty and graduates of the Moscow Regional Pedagogical Institute, which enabled the reconstruction of the historiographical context and identification of key methodological approaches formed at the history faculty during the 1930s
– early 1950s.
Results. The conducted analysis revealed the key directions of the historical school at the Moscow Regional Pedagogical Institute in the 1930s–1950s, encompassing state-patriotic, universalist-humanistic, and synthetic orientations, each reflecting the specifics of ideological and methodological transformations in Soviet historiography.
Research implications. The research findings can be applied in developing strategies for educational policy in the Russian Federation aimed at advancing patriotic education and a civilizational approach in historical education, drawing on the traditions of the scholarly school of the Moscow Regional Pedagogical Institute.
About the Authors
E. A. KurenkovaRussian Federation
Evgeniya A. Kurenkova – Cand. Sci. (History), Assoc. Prof., Department of History of Russia,
Moscow.
V. V. Bruz
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Bruz – Dr. Sci. (History), Prof., Department of Public and Municipal Service of the Faculty of Economics,
Moscow.
A. N. Fuks
Russian Federation
Alexander N. Fuks – Dr. Sci. (History), Prof., Departmentally Head, Department for the Development of Educational Activities, Russian Society "Knowledge",
Moscow.
References
1. Baghdasaryan, V. E. (2014). Nation-building or empire-building: a fork in approaches. In: Problem analysis and public-management design, 7-1, 47–50 (in Russ.).
2. Baghdasaryan, V. E. (2013). Superiority, appropriation, inequality. Moscow, Scientific expert Publ. (in Russ.).
3. Grekov B., ed. (1939–1940). Against the anti-Marxist concept of M.N. Pokrovsky. 2 parts. Moscow-Leningrad: Acad. Sciences of the USSR Publ. (in Russ.).
4. Tikhonov, V. V. (2011). N. L. Rubinstein – teacher of the Moscow Regional Pedagogical Institute of N. K. Krupskaya. In: Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: History and Political Science, 3, 69–73 (in Russ.).
5. Kondratyev, S. V. & Kondratyeva, T. N. (2005). B. F. Porshnev – interpreter of French absolutism. In: French yearbook, 2005, 76–95 (in Russ.).
6. Kondratyeva, T. N. (2009). B. F. Porshnev and discussion on absolutism at the Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences CCCP (1940). In: Izvestia of the Ural State University. Series 2: Humanities, 3, 240–247 (in Russ.).
7. Zhuo, K. (2007). The history of popular rebellion in the narrative of B.F. Porshnev and R. Mounier. In: French yearbook, 2007, 57–70 (in Russ.).
8. Kondratyev, S. V. & Kondratyeva, T. N. (2007). B. F. Porshnev in the discussion on the role of the class struggle in history (1948–1953). In: French yearbook, 2007, 34–54 (in Russ.).
9. Baghdasaryan, V. E. & Sylvester, arch. (Lukashenko, S. P.). (2022). Traditional values: strategy of civilizational revival. Yaroslavl (in Russ.).
Review
JATS XML




















