Indo-European studies deconstructed (reflections on a book by Jean-Paul Demoule)
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5164-2024-5-283-289
Abstract
Aim. To analyze the deconstructivist approach to the Indo-European problem.
Methodology. Using J.-P. Demoule’s book, an attempt is made to understand if this approach is fruitful, specifically if the analysis of the political context of Indo-European studies at various stages of their development in various countries can contribute to the resolution of the Indo-European problem.
Results. Attempts at blurring the boundary between a scholarly discipline and the social-political context in which it develops entail the risk of the discipline’s dissolution in its history and of its eventual disappearance, as evidenced by Demoule’s conclusion that Indo-Europeans are a myth.
Research implications. This case study demonstrates that the deconstructivist approach can be useful only with regard to the history of a discipline, not to the discipline itself.
About the Author
A. G. Kozintsev
Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander G. Kozintsev – Dr Sci (History), Senior Researcher,
Universitetskaia nab. 3, St. Petersburg 199034
References
1. Klein L. S. [Archeology in the saddle (Kossinna from a distance of 70 years)]. In: Stratum Plus, 2000, no. 4, pp. 88–140.
2. Kozintsev A. G. [Between Eurasia and the Middle East: Analysis of the relations of the Indo-European language family with the help of a quasi-areal model]. In: Epistemologica et historiographica linguistica Lausannensia, 2019, no. 1, pp. 79–86.
3. Mogilner M. Homo imperii. Istoriya fizicheskoy antropologii v Rossii [Homo imperii. History of physical anthropology in Russia]. Moscow, Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2008. 512 p.
4. Trubetskoy N. [Thoughts on the Indo-European problem]. In: Trubetskoy N. Izbrannyye trudy po filologii [Selected works on philology]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1987, pp. 44–59.
5. Demoule J.-P. The Indo-Europeans. Archaeology, Language, Race, and the Search for the Origins of the West. New York, Oxford University Press, 2023. 563 p.
6. Dyen I., Kruskal J. B., Black P. An Indo-European Classification: A Lexicostatistical Experiment. In: Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 1992, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 1–132.
7. Kozintsev A. On certain aspects of distance-based models of language relationships, with reference to the position of Indo-European among other language families. In: Journal of Indo-European Studies, 2018, vol. 46, no. 1–2, pp. 173–205.
8. Kozintsev A. On the homelands of Indo-European and Eurasiatic: Geographic aspects of a lexicostatistical classification. In: Journal of Indo-European Studies, 2020, vol. 48, no. 1–2, pp. 181–150.
9. Pellard T., Sagart L., Jacques G. L’indo-européen n’est pas un mythe. In: Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 2018, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 79–102.
10. Librado P., Tressières G., Chauvey L., et al. Widespread horse-based mobility arose around 2,200 BCE in Eurasia. In: Nature, 2024, vol. 631, no. 8022, pp. 819–825.
11. Kozintsev A. Proto-Indo-Europeans: The prologue. In: Journal of Indo-European Studies. 2019, vol. 47, no. 3–4, pp. 293–380.
Review
Views:
23
Email this article 