Preview

Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and Political Sciences

Advanced search

The food sovereignty policy in the Plurinational State of Bolivia: causes and consequences

https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5164-2024-1-160-171

Abstract

Aim. To identify the features of the formation and implementation of the food sovereignty policy in the Plurinational State of Bolivia.

Methodology. The author used a retrospective analysis to establish the reasons for the integration of the concept of food sovereignty into the legal space of the Bolivia. With the help of the method of historical and logical unity, the author determined the role of social movements in the process of institutionalization of the idea of food sovereignty. The author used the method of secondary data analysis and an institutional approach to classify official documents, identify executive authorities and describe programs that contribute to the implementation of the food sovereignty policy in the country. The position of the Bolivia in the global process of production of genetically modified soybeans was recorded and characterized by the method of statistical observation and visualization.

Results. Based on the results of the study, the author concluded that the policy of food sovereignty was inconsistent, characterized by asymmetry in land ownership, disproportion in socio-economic development, financial prioritization of large agro-industrial business, monopolization of markets, export-oriented extractivism and illegal production of biotechnological cash crops.

Research implications. The author identified the key aspects of the state’s food sovereignty policy, noted its strengths and weaknesses, outlined the contours of further development.

About the Author

A. V. Malov
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Alexander V. Malov – Cand. Sci. (Political science), Assoc. Prof., Department of Theoretical and Applied Political Science, Faculty of International Relations and Foreign Area Studies, Institute of History and Archives



References

1. Albу X. Suma qamaсa = convivir bien. їCуmo medirlo? In: Farah I., Vasapollo L., ed. Vivir bien: їParadigma no capitalista? La Paz, CIDES-UMSA, 2011, pp. 133–144.

2. Alderman J. The Houses That Evo Built: Autonomy, Vivir bien, and Viviendas in Bolivia. In: Latin American Perspectives, 2021, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 100–118.

3. Araъjo S. The Promise and Challenges of Food Sovereignty Policies in Latin America. In: Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, 2010, vol. 13, pp. 493–506.

4. Byaruhanga R., Isgren E. Rethinking the Alternatives: Food Sovereignty as a Prerequisite for Sustainable Food Security. In: Food ethics, 2023, vol. 8, no. 16, pp. 1–20.

5. Catacora-Vargas G., et al. Brief historical review of agroecology in Bolivia. In: Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 2017, vol. 41, no. 3-4, pp. 429–447.

6. Chugrov S. V., Malov A. V. Food sovereignty and education: A Japanese type of harmonization. In: RUDN Journal of Sociology, 2019, no. 4, pp. 665–677.

7. Colque G., Tinta E., Sanjinйs E. Segunda reforma agraria: Una historia que incomoda. La Paz, TIERRA, 2016. 254 p.

8. Cуrdova Alarcуn L., Zapatta Carpio A. Soberanнa alimentaria en Ecuador y Bolivia: polнticas y normativa. In: Revista Ciencias Sociales, 2018, vol. 1, no. 39, pp. 59–72.

9. Fabricant N. Mobilizing Bolivia’s displaced: Indigenous politics and the struggle over land. Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press, 2012. 257 p.

10. Fabricant N. Good Living for Whom? Bolivia’s Climate Justice Movement and the Limitations of Indigenous Cosmovisions. In: Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 2013, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 159– 178.

11. Gangopadhyay A. From land wars to gas wars: Chile-Bolivia relations and globalization. In: India Quarterly, 2014, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 139–152.

12. Harvey D. The “New” Imperialism: Accumulation by dispossession. In: Socialist Register, 2004, vol. 40, pp. 63– 87.

13. Healy K. Llamas, Weavings and Organic Chocolate: Multicultural Grassroots Development in the Andes and Amazon of Bolivia. Notre Dame (IN), University of Notre Dame Press, 2001. 485 p.

14. Hecht S.B. Soybeans, Development and conservation on the Amazon Frontier. In: Development and Change, 2005, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 375–404.

15. Henderson С. The rise of Arab Gulf agro-capital: continuity and change in the corporate food regime. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2022, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1079–1100.

16. Lucero J. Indigenous Political Voice and the Struggle for Recognition in Ecuador and Bolivia. In: Bebbington A., Dani A., de Haan A., Walton M., ed. Institutional Pathways to Equity. Washington, The World Bank, 2008, pp. 139–167.

17. McKay B. The politics of agrarian change in Bolivia’s soy complex. In: Journal of Agrarian Change, 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 406–424.

18. McMichael P. Critical agrarian studies and crises of the world-historical present. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2023, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 725–757.

19. McKay B., Nehring R., Walsh-Dilley M. The ‘state’ of food sovereignty in Latin America: political projects and alternative pathways in Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2014, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1175–1200.

20. Mercado G., Hjortsш C. N. Explaining the development policy implementation gap: A case of a failed food sovereignty policy in Bolivia. In: World Development, 2023, vol. 166, pp. 1–15.

21. Merino R. The Geopolitics of Food Security and Food Sovereignty in Latin America: Harmonizing Competing Visions or Reinforcing Extractive Agriculture? In: Geopolitics, 2022, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 898– 920.

22. Perreault T. Geographies of Neoliberalism in Latin America. In: Environment and Planning, 2005, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 191–201.

23. Perreault T. From the Guerra del Agua to the Guerra del Gas: Resource Governance, Neoliberalism and Popular Protest in Bolivia. In: Antipode, 2006, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 150–172.

24. Perreault T. Custom and Contradiction: Rural Water Governance and the Politics of Usos y Costumbres in Bolivia’s Irrigators’ Movement. In: Annals of the Association of American Geographer, 2008, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 834–854.

25. Sumner J., McMurtry J., Tarhan D. Growing Community Sustenance: The Social Economy as a Route to Indigenous Food Sovereignty. In: Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 2023, vol. 14, pp. 106–121.

26. Tilzey M. Authoritarian populism and neo-extractivism in Bolivia and Ecuador: the unresolved agrarian question and the prospects for food sovereignty as counter-hegemony. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2019, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 626–652.

27. Urioste M. Concentration and “foreignisation” of land in Bolivia. In: Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 2012, vol. 33, pp. 439–457.

28. Valdivia G. Agrarian Capitalism and Struggles over Hegemony in the Bolivian Lowlands. In: Latin American Perspectives, 2010, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 67–87.

29. Vera C. G., Mendoza Pinto J. El choque de dos imaginarios geopoli ticos en Bolivia. La “Guerra del Gas”. In: Revista de Estudios Transfronterizos, 2015, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 115–139.

30. Webber J. R. Red October: Left-Indigenous Struggles in Modern Bolivia. Historical Materialism Book Series. Chicago, Haymarket Books, 2012. 420 p.


Review

Views: 254


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5156 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5164 (Online)