Discussions in the USSR on the problems of the content of school history and their reflection in modern literature
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5164-2024-1-141-147
Abstract
Aim. To analyze the state and nature of the state historical educational policy of the USSR and summarize the views of modern scholars-historians studying the discussions that took place in the historical and methodological community of the USSR.
Methodology. The article examines modern historiographical sources devoted to the discussions in the historical and methodological science of the USSR. When conducting the study, a comparative historical method was used, as well as methods of observation, generalization and interpretation of the results.
Results. In the course of the work, the views of modern historians on issues related to discussions in the historical and methodological science of the USSR were revealed, their similarities and differences were determined.
Research implications. The results of the study contribute to the historiographical study of the modern sources devoted to the state historical educational policy of the USSR.
About the Author
A. A. Sotnikov
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Sotnikov – Postgraduate Student, Department of Innovative Technologies of Historical, Social Science and Legal Education
References
1. Baghdasaryan V. E., Samolyuk M. N. [The myth about totalitarianism of the Soviet historical science: discussion in the Soviet historiography in the second half of the 1950s and the beginning of the 1980th]. In: Kazachestvo [The Cossacks], 2019, no. 42, pp. 24–41.
2. Bukharaev V. M. [On this side of events and facts: ideological and political objectives of educational texts on history]. In: Uchenyye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnyye nauki [Scientific notes of Kazan University. Series: Humanities], 2009, no. 2-2, pp. 189–195.
3. Lebedev A. S. [Problems of teaching history in the USSR in the second half of the 1930s]. In: Originalnyye issledovaniya [Original research], 2020, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 188–197.
4. Pepelina N. I. [The history of popular education in the USSR in the 1930-s: the working on text-book of the National History]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta im. M. A. Sholokhova. Istoriya i politologiya [Vestnik of Sholokhov Moscow State University for the Humanities. History and political science series], 2013, no. 2, pp. 19–32.
5. Pepelina N. I. [Experience of creating the Soviet school text-book on history]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoricheskiye nauki [MCU Journal of Historical Studies], 2011, no. 2, pp. 96–109.
6. Protasova I. A. [Discussions of the 1950–1980s. in domestic historical and methodological science] In: Istoriko-pedagogicheskiye chteniya [Historical and pedagogical readings], 2003, no. 7, pp. 378–381.
7. Tuhvatullin A. Kh., Stolyarov A. M. [A discussion of the problems of teaching history and social sciences in the journal “Marxist-Historian” in 1928]. In: Sovremennaya nauka: aktual’nyye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Gumanitarnyye nauki [Modern science: actual problems of theory and practice. Series: Humanities], 2020, no. 7, pp. 10–14.
8. Fuks A. N. Shkolnyye uchebniki po otechestvennoy istorii kak istorioraficheskiy fenomen (konets XVII v. – vtoraya polovina 1930-kh gg.) [School textbooks on Russian history as a historiographical phenomenon (late 17th century – second half of the 1930s). Moscow, MGOU Publ., 2017. 420 p.
9. Schulepnikova E. I. [The discussion of the subject of teaching history methods in the 1950s]. In: Sovremennyy uchonyy [Modern scientist], 2019, no. 2, pp. 180–184.
10. Shchulepnikova E. I. [Why history was not taught in schools in the 1920s]. In: Prepodavaniye istorii v shkole [Teaching history at school], 2014, no. 5, pp. 26–29.
Review
Views:
183
Email this article 