L. M. Sukhotin's correspondence as a historical source
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5164-2023-4-70-80
Abstract
Aim. To identify the significance of L. M. Sukhotin's correspondence as a source for studying history of Russian historical science and compiling an intellectual biography of the scientist.
Methodology. The analysis of ego-documents represented by L. M. Sukhotin's correspondence was carried out in accordance with the principles of historicism and objectivity. A comprehensive analysis used in the article implies identifying the connection of historical sources with the characteristics of a person as a socio-cultural phenomenon, his system of values, and historical features of thinking.
Results. The important role of L. M. Sukhotin's correspondence for the study of the history of Russian historical science is demonstrated, the features of this type of sources were shown. The systematization of the preserved letters of the scientist was carried out.
Research implications. The unpublished archival materials were introduced into scientific circulation, which can be used in research on the historiography of a number of issues of the 16th–17th centuries, as well as in studying the activities of Zemgor.
About the Author
S. Matveev
State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Matveev – Postgraduate student, Department of Modern History of Russia
ul. Very Voloshinoi 24, Mytishchi 141014, Moscow Region
References
1. Emelyanov Yu. N. [L. M. Sukhotin. Life path and scientific creativity]. In: Dolgikh A. N., Fomin V . V ., eds. Rossiyskaya gosudarstvennost v litsakh i sudbakh yeye sozidateley: IX–XXI vv. [Russian statehood in the faces and destinies of its creators: 9th–21st centuries]. Lipetsk, RIC LGPU Publ., 2009, pp. 244–269.
2. Matveev S. A. [L. M. Sukhotin and his work “The Family of Nobles of the Sukhotins”]. In: Letopis Istoriko-rodoslovnogo obshchestva v Moskve [Chronicle of the Historical and Genealogical Society in Moscow], 2020, iss. 16, pp. 23–35.
3. Naumov O. N. [Letters from V. S. Arsenyev to L. M. Savelov as a historical source]. In: Letopis Istorikorodoslovnogo obshchestva v Moskve [Chronicle of the Historical and Genealogical Society in Moscow], 2020, iss. 16, pp. 36–58.
4. Nikulshin N. V . [Sergey Belokurov – historian, archaeographist, bibliophil]. In: Ivanova E. A., ed. Rumyantsevskiye chteniya 2019. H. 2 [Rumyantsev Readings 2019. Part 2]. Moscow, Pashkov Dom Publ., 2019, pp. 218–223. 5. Stanislavsky A. L. [Totalitarianism of the 20th century and the problems of the oprichnina in the works of L. M. Sukhotin]. In: Afanasyev Yu. N., Novoseltsev A. P., eds. Spornyye voprosy otechestvennoy istorii XI–XVIII vekov. Ch. II [Controversial issues of domestic history of the 11th–18th centuries. Part II]. Moscow, 1990, pp. 259–263
Review
Views:
87
Email this article 