Preview

Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and Political Sciences

Advanced search

Another analysis of the cause of origin of the Indo-Europeans

https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2022-5-45-56

Abstract

Aim. The following article considers a new theory for resolving the longstanding problem of identifying the geographic and temporal origin of Indo-Europeans. All existing theories provided thus far for the origin of Indo-Europeans suffer from one common error: the approaches presuppose an economic deterministic model for understanding historical transformation. However, Indo-Europeans were a community circumscribed by common language, therefore culture seems a more proper domain for analysis of origins than does an economistic approach.

Methodology. The Indo-European population as a bounded community, however, is circumscribed by its common cultural formation, that of language. In this paper, we present an alternative theory for the emergence of Indo-Europeans and situate this origin in time and place. We rely on the Weberian hypothesis of a spiritual axial shift spurring an early prehistoric cultural transformation. By synthesizing historical linguistic and archaeological evidence, the approach offered below aims to the solve problems corresponding to a vulgar materialism’s economic determinist approach to IndoEuropean origin.

Results. This paper proposes that the proper basis for analysis of cultural origins of Indo-Europeans resides at the level of spiritual production. A shortcoming of traditional archaeological formulations is its reliance on materialist models for spiritual and cultural concerns.

Research implications. By shifting the methodological and theoretical framing of the problem, this paper seeks to bypass the perpetual circling of the problem by proponents of the materialist model.

About the Author

H. M. Shephard
Archaeological Institute of America
United States

Henry M. Shephard – member signature

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania



References

1. Anthony D. W., Ringe D. The Indo-European Homeland from Linguistic and Archaeological Perspectives. In: Annual Review of Linguistics, 2015, vol. 1, pp. 199–219.

2. Apollodorus H. R. The Library of Greek Mythology. Oxford University Press, 1997. 336 p.

3. Bailly A. Dictionnaire grec-français. Vol. 2. Hachette, 1895. 2227 p.

4. Berneker E. Slavisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Univ. of Heidelberg, 1924. 772 p.

5. Boyadzhiev A. Staroblgarskaya Chitanka. Sofia, 2016. 619 p.

6. Carling G., Cronhamn S., Farren R., Aliyev E., Frid J. The causality of borrowing: Lexical loans in Eurasian languages. In: PloS One, 2019. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223588

7. Das G. D. Bhagavata Subodhini. The Fourth Stage of Creation. Chapter 14: History of the king of Vena. Song 4. Tulsi Books, 2022.

8. Demiraj B. Albanische Etymologien: Untersuchungen zum albanischen Erbwortschatz. In: Leiden Studies in Indo-European Series. Rodobi, 1997. 180 p. 9. Derkson R. Etymological Dictionary of the Slavic Inherited Lexicon. Boston, Brill Publ., 2008. 726 p.

9. De Vaan M. Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages. Boston, Brill Publ., 2008. 825 p.

10. Fagan B. M., ed. The Oxford Companion to Archaeology. Oxford University Press, 1996. 864 p.

11. Farnell L. R. Roscher’s Lexicon of Mythology – Greek Section (Vol. 3 Letter «N», Nestos № 4, line 1-576), B.G. Teubner, 1888. Line 433.

12. Fasmer M. Etymological Dictionary Russian Language. In 4 vols. Moscow, AST Publ., 2022.

13. Guidolotto L. T., Lucian O. S. Dialogues of the Gods. 1518.

14. Hunter R., ed. Apollonius of Rhodes: Argonautica Book IV. Cambridge University Press, 2015. 339 p.

15. Ivanov V. I. Dionysos und die vordionysischen Kulte. Mohr Siebeck, 2012. 416 p.

16. Kroonen G. Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Vol. 47. Boston, Brill Publ., 2013. 750 p.

17. Librado P., Khan N., Fages A., et al. The origins and spread of domestic horses from the Western Eurasian steppes. In: Nature, 2021, no. 598, pp. 634–640.

18. Miklosich M. Lexicon Linguae Slovenicae Veteris Dialecti. Vindobonae, 1850. 204 p. 20. Nonnos. Dionysiaca. Books 1–15. Harvard University Press, 1940. 576 p.

19. Olander T. Common Slavic Accentological Word List. Editiones Olander, 2001. 28 p.

20. Orel V. E. A Handbook of Germanic Etymology. Boston, Brill Publ., 2012. 683 p.

21. Orel V. E. Albanian Etymological Dictionary. Boston, Brill Publ., 1998. 670 p

22. Ovid. Metamorphoses. Spring Publications, 1989. 359 p.

23. Preller L. Griechische Mythologie. Vol. 1. Leather Bound, 1894. 964 p.

24. Hujer O., Smetбnka E., Weingart M., Havrбnek B., eds. Příruční slovník jazyka českého. Vol I. Praha, 1935–1957.

25. Ringe D. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford University Press, 2006. 416 p.

26. Hujer O., Smetбnka E. at al., eds. Slovnik spisovného jazyka českého. Praha, 1960–1971, 1989. 528 p.

27. Smoczyński W. Indoeuropejskie podstawy słownictwa bałtyckiego. In: Acta Baltico-Slavica, 1982, vol. 14, pp. 235–236.

28. Watkins C. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2000. 149 p.

29. Weber M. Anthology. Society image. Moscow, Jurist Publ., 1994. 702 p.

30. West M. L. Indo-European Poetry and Myth. Oxford University Press, 2007. 525 p.

31. Wodtko D. S. Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics. De Gruyter Mouton, 2017. 1256 p.

32. Yarovoy E. V. Mounds of the Eneolithic-Bronze Age of the Lower Dniester. Kishinev, Shtiintsa, 1990. 270 р.


Review

Views: 103


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5156 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5164 (Online)