Ботайские коневоды против ямных переселенцев: кто победил?
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2022-5-9-23
Аннотация
Цель. Статья представляет собой краткий обзор основных историографических тенденций и посвящена периоду начала глобализации в Евразийских степях – периоду формирования и доминирования элитных кланов в эпоху энеолита и раннего бронзового века.
Процедура и методы. Автор, опираясь на данные популяционной генетики, радиоуглеродные датировки и материалы изобразительных памятников, предлагает модель взаимодействия населения в Казахской степи и Туркестане.
Результаты. На основании известных инноваций в конском снаряжении и упряжи, в колёсном и ином наземном транспорте, успехов в приручении лошадей и верховой езде в статье рассмотрены основные векторы коммуникации населения и общие тенденции в развитии этнокультурной ситуации данного периода.
Теоретическая и/или практическая значимость. Отмечены основные факторы и особенности комплексной модели коммуникации и взаимодействия древних обществ степей Евразии, которые на разных этапах исторического развития демонстрируют неизбежную гегемонию или экспансию небольших, но весьма прогрессивных для своего времени кланов, обладающих передовыми инновациями и подчиненных этническому самосознанию.
Об авторе
В. А. НовожёновКазахстан
Новожёнов Виктор Александрович – кандидат исторических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник
005550, г. Алматы, Кабанбайбатыр, 94
Список литературы
1. Allentoft M. E., Sikora M., Sjögren K.-G., et al. Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. In: Nature, 2015, no. 522, pp. 167–172.
2. Berezkin Yu. E. [«Seven brothers», «heavenly cart» and the ancestral home of the Indo-Europeans]. In: Etnograficheskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic Review], 2015, no. 3, pp. 3–14.
3. Cheremisin D. V., Komissarov S. A., Soloviev A. I. [Rock images of Central Asian chariots as a marker of mobility and migration]. In: Mobilnost i migratsiya: kontsptsii, metody, rezultaty [Mobility and migration: concepts, methods, results]. Novosibirsk, 2019, pp. 215–228.
4. Chernykh E. N. Stepnoy poyas Evrazii: fenomen kochevykh kultur [The steppe belt of Eurasia: Phenomenon of nomadic cultures]. Moscow, Rukopisi Drevney Rusi Publ., 2009. 622 p.
5. Chechushkov I. V. [Distribution of wheeled transport in the light of radiocarbon chronology]. In: Epimakhov A.V., ed. Tainstvo etnicheskoy istorii drevneyshikh nomadov stepey Evrazii. Kollektivnaya monografiya pamyati E. E. Kuzminoy [The mystery of the ethnic history of the most ancient nomads of the steppe Eurasia. Collective monograph in memory of E. E. Kuzmina]. Almaty, Ostrov Krym Publ., 2014. P. 274–285.
6. Chechushkov I., Epimakhov A., Bersenev A. Early horse bridle with cheekpieces as a marker of social change: An experimental and statistical study. In: Journal of Archaeological Science, 2018, no. 97, pp. 125–136.
7. Damgaard P., Martiniano R., Kamm J., et al. The first horse herders and the impact of early Bronze Age steppe expansions into Asia. In: Scienсе, 2018, no. 556. DOI: 10.1126/science.aar771
8. Epimakhov A. V., Hanks B., Renfrew K. [Radiocarbon chronology of the Bronze Age sites in the Trans-Urals]. In: Rossiyskaya arkheologiya [Russian Archaeology], 2005, no. 4, pp. 92–102.
9. Gaiduchenko L. L. [Seven millennia of the history of the Kazakh horse]. In: Vsadniki Velikoy Stepi: traditsii i novatsii. Trudy Instituta arkheologii. Vip. IV [Riders of the Great Steppe: traditions and innovations. Proceedings of the Institute of Archaeology. Iss. IV]. Astana, 2014. P. 300–310.
10. Gaunitz Ch., Fages A., Hanghшj K., et al. Ancient genomes revisit the ancestry of domestic and Przewalski’s horses. In: Science 2018, 22. DOI: 10.1126/science.aao3297
11. Grigoriev S. A. Drevnie indoevropeytsy [Ancient Indo-Europeans]. Chelyabinsk, Cicero Publ., 2015. 443 p.
12. Kasparov A. R., Avanesova N. A. [From the Volga to the Zeravshan: Intercultural Interactions in the Paleometallic Age]. In: Ionesov V. I., ed. Samara–Samarkand: nasledie i sovremennost v dialoge kultur ot Volgi do Zeravshana: materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (Samara, 2016) [Samara-Samarkand: heritage and modernity in the dialogue of cultures from the Volga to Zeravshan. Materials of the International Scientific Conf. (Samara, 2016)]. Samara, Institut Kultury, 2017. P. 204–228.
13. Khokhlov A. A., Kitov E. P. [The physical appearance of representatives of the Botai Eneolithic culture in the context of the problem of the formation of the steppe population of Kazakhstan]. In: Kazakhskoe khanstvo v potoke istorii: sb. nauchnykh statey, posvyaschenniy 550-letiyu obrazovaniya Kazakhskogo khanstva [Kazakh Khanate in the flow of history: dedicated to 550th anniversary of the formation of the Kazakh Khanate]. Almaty, Institut Archaeologii Publ., 2015. P. 437–445.
14. Klein L. S. Once again on the issue of Tocharian migration. In: Stratum plus, 2011, no. 2, pp. 183–186.
15. Kovalev A. A. [Ancient Europeans in the heart of Asia: Chemurchek phenomenon as a key to solving the problem of the Tocharian ancestral home]. In: Kultury stepnoy Evrazii i ikh vzaimodeystvie s drevnimi tsivilizatsiayami. Kniga 2 [Cultures of the steppe Eurasia and their interaction with ancient civilizations. Book 2]. St. Petersburg, 2012. P. 49–56.
16. Kosintsev P. A. [Chariot horses]. In: Kuznetsov P. F., ed. Koni, kolesnitsy, kolesnichie stepey Evrazii [Horses, chariots and charioteers of the steppes of Eurasia]. Yekaterinburg, Samara, Donetsk, 2010. P. 21–79.
17. Kristiansen K., et al. Trade and civilisation: economic networks and cultural ties, from prehistory to the early modern era. Cambrige, Cambrige University Press, 2018. 564 p.
18. Kukushkin I. A. [Archaeological complexes of Kazakhstan with chariot paraphernalia. A new aspect in the archaeology of the bronze of Kazakhstan]. In: Baitanaev B. A., ed. Svideteli tysyacheletiya: Arkheologicheskaya nauka Kazakhstana za 20 let (1991–2011) [Witnesses of millennia: Archaeological science of Kazakhstan for 20 years (1991–2011)]. Almaty, Institut Archaeologii Publ., 2011. P. 97–113.
19. Kupriyanova E., Epimakhov A., Berseneva N., et al. Bronze Age charioteers of the Eurasian steppe: a part-time occupation for select men? In: Praehisotirische Zeitschrift 2017, no. 1, pp. 40–65.
20. Kuzmina E. E. Predystoriya Velikogo Shyolkovogo puti: Dialog kultur Evropa-Aziya [Prehistory of the Great Silk Road: Dialogue of Europe-Asia Cultures]. Moscow, Komkniga Publ., 2010. 236 p.
21. Masson V. M. Kulturogenez drevney Tsentralnoy Azii [Cultural genesis of ancient Central Asia]. St. Petersburg, 2006. 379 p.
22. Merts I. V., Svyatko S. V. Radiocarbon chronology of the Early Bronze Age sites of North-Eastern and Eastern Kazakhstan. First experience. In: Theory and practice of archeological research 2016, no. 1 (13), pp. 126–150.
23. Motuzaite Matuzeviciute G., Lightfoot E., O’Connell T., et al. The extent of cereal cultivation among the Bronze Age to Turkic period societies of Kazakhstan determined using stable isotope analysis of bone collagen. In: Journal of Archaeological Science 2015, no. 59, pp. 23–34.
24. Novozhenov V. A. Chudo kommunikatsii i drevneyshiy kolyosniy transport Evrazii [The Miracle of Communication and the Earliest Wheeled Transport of Eurasia]. Ed. E. Kuzmina. Moscow: Taus, 2012. (Russian)
25. Novozhenov V. A. [The Great Steppe: Human in the System of Ancient Communications]. In: Epimakhov A. V., ed. Tainstvo etnicheskoy istorii drevneyshikh nomadov stepey Evrazii. Kollektivnaya monografiya pamyati E. E. Kuzminoy [The mystery of the ethnic history of the most ancient nomads of the steppe Eurasia. Collective monograph in memory of E. E. Kuzmina]. Almaty, 2014. P. 18–267.
26. Novozhenov V. A. [Communications and transport of the country of Margush in space and time]. In: Trudy Margianskoy arkheologicheskoy ekspeditsii. T. 6. V pamyat V. I. Sarianidi [Proceedings of the Margiana archaeological expedition. Vol. 6. In memory of V. I. Sarianidi]. Moscow, Staryi Sad Publ., 2016. P. 361–377.
27. Novozhenov V. A. Rock Art Chronicles of Golden Steppe. Vol. 1: Model of Communication in Antiquity and Early Middle Ages Almaty: UNESCO Center for the Rapprochement of Cultures, 2020. 780 p.
28. Sher Ya. A. Petroglify Sredney i Tsentral’noy Azii [Petroglyphs of Middle and Central Asia]. Moscow: Science, 1980. 328 p.
29. Usmanova E. R., Chechushkov I. V., Kosintsev P. A., et al. [The horse in the spiritual culture and social structure of the population of the Ural-Kazakhstan steppes in the Bronze Age (based on materials from the burial ground Novoilyinovsky II)]. In: Zdanovich D. G., ed. Stepnaya Evraziya v epokhu bronzy: kultury, idei, tekhnologii: k 80-letiyu G. B. Zdanovicha [Steppe Eurasia in the Bronze Age: Cultures, Ideas, Technologies: to the 80th anniversary of G. B. Zdanovich]. Chelyabinsk, 2018. P. 198–215.
30. Zaitseva G. I., Dubova N. A., Sementsov A. A., et al. [Radiocarbon chronology of the Gonur-Depe site]. In: Trudy Margianskoy arkheologicheskoy ekspeditsii. T. 2 [Proceedings of the Margiana archaeological expedition. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2008. P. 166–178.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Новожёнов В.А. Ботайские коневоды против ямных переселенцев: кто победил? Вестник Государственного университета просвещения. Серия: История и политические науки. 2022;(5):9-23. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2022-5-9-23
For citation:
Novozhenov V.A. Botai horse-breeders vs Yamnaya migrants: who won? Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and Political Sciences. 2022;(5):9-23. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2022-5-9-23