FEATURES OF MODERN PARLIAMENTARISM IN THE TRANSCAUCASIAN STATES: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2022-3-140-147
Abstract
Aim. The purpose of this article is to identify the development of parliamentarianism in the countries of Transcaucasia as well as their gradual transition to Western political and legal models.
Methodology. In this article some problems of formation and development of parliamentarism which take place in the countries of Transcaucasia are considered. The parliaments of such countries as Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia were analyzed by means of comparative analysis of their politics. The research was based on the following methods: formalization, historical and sociological approaches.
Results. A conclusion is drawn that in the countries of Transcaucasia under research two trends of parliamentarism should be distinguished: either reception of Western models within the local peculiarities of these countries or giving them the role of pro-presidential structures.
Research implications. The author compared the dynamics of parliamentarism development in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, and conducted a political and legal research into the history of their formation and functioning in the post-Soviet period.
About the Author
K. Abdulazizov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kamil M. Abdulazizov – Postgraduate Student, Department of Comparative Political Science
119991, Moscow, Leninskie Gory 1
References
1. Borisov N. A. [Parliamentization of government management forms in the post-Soviet states. The causes and consequences]. In: Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya [Bulletin of the Russian State Humanitarian University. Series: political science. History. International relationships], 2018, no. 3 (13), pp. 93–110.
2. Kakhrimanov A. M. [Dual nature of the Azerbaijan Republic’s politics]. In: Vyssheye obrazovaniye segodnya [Higher education today], 2016, no. 7, pp. 62–68.
3. Kerimov A. A. [Modern parliamentarism: specific factors and problems of development]. In: Izvestiya Irkutskogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya. Religiovedeniye [The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series: Political Science and Religion Studies], 2015, no. 11, pp. 30–36.
4. Stepanyan V. V. [The National Assembly in the Model of Parliamentary Government of the Republic of Armenia]. In: Severo-kavkazskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik [North Caucasian Legal Bulletin], 2017, no. 2, pp. 108–111.
5. Shul’zhenko Yu. L. [The concept of «parliamentarism» in the modern Russian science]. In: Trudy instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2017, no. 5, pp. 14–36.
6. Yagizarov S. N. [Mass media role in formation and development of political pluralism in the Azerbaijan Republic]. In: Vestnik ekspertnogo soveta [Bulletin of the Expert Council], 2017, no. 2 (9), pp. 156–160.
Review
Views:
142
Email this article 