Preview

Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and Political Sciences

Advanced search

HISTORY OF ANCIENT ROME AS A CONFIRMATION OF THE RELEVANCEOF THE ASIAN MODE OF PRODUCTION CONCEPT

https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2021-4-141-149

Abstract

Aim. By analysing the dynamics of the development of the socio-political institutions of the Roman state at different stages of its existence, the article attempts to prove the relevance of the Asiatic mode of production and the invalidity of the concept of class theory. Methodology. Using the historical development of the Roman state as an example, the concept of estate-class and Asian formations is examined; the development of the basis and individual elements of the superstructure is analysed; a comparative characterisation of the results is made in order to identify inconsistencies and contradictions in them. The dialectical method of research is taken as the basis. General scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, hermeneutics, classification, typology, systematisation, analogy), special historical methods (comparative-historical, periodisation, chronological, problem-chronological, actualisation), methods of concrete and logical analysis were also applied. Results. It is revealed that there are weaknesses in the concept of the class formation, which do not allow to explain some phenomena in the development of the Roman state, while confirming the concept of the Asian formation. Research implications. The results of the research allow us to objectively examine the two major trends within the formational approach for inconsistencies with objective reality, i.e. allow us to verify or refute their scientific validity. In addition, a systematization of individual episodes of the development of social and political institutions of ancient Roman society has been carried out, which allows further use of these results in the research of related topics.

About the Authors

N. V. Alekhina
Saint-Petersburg University of Humanities and Social Sciences
Russian Federation


S. A. Klyusov
Saint-Petersburg University of Humanities and Social Sciences
Russian Federation


References

1. Грант М. Римские императоры. М.: Терра, 1998. 400 с.

2. Коптев А. В. От прав гражданства к праву колоната. Формирование крепостного права в поздней Римской империи. Вологда: Ардвисура, 1995. 264 с.

3. Корякин В. В. Деградация советского марксизма на примере философии и методологии истории второй половины XX века // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2019. № 1. С. 29-43.

4. Кузищин В. И. История Древнего Рима. М.: Высшая школа, 1982. 336 с.

5. Маркс К. Капитал. Критика политической экономии. Т. 1. М.: Политиздат, 1988. 891 с.

6. Машкин Н. А. Принципат Августа: Происхождение и социальная сущность. М., 2014. 718 с.

7. Меркулов И. В. К вопросу о реформе Гая Мария в Риме (II в. до н. э.) // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 9: Исследования молодых учёных. 2006. № 5. С. 16-21.

8. Моммзен Т. История Рима: в 5 т. СПб.: Наука, Ювента, 1997.

9. Нуреев Р. М. Проблема «азиатского способа производства» в советской историко-экономической литературе // Вестник московского университета. 1979. № 5. С. 13-22.

10. Паркет Г. М. История легионов Рима. От военной реформы Гая Мария до восхождения на престол Септимия Севера. М.: Центрполиграф, 2017. 240 с.

11. Поло де Болье М.-А. Средневековая Франция. М.: Вече, 2014. 384 с.

12. Гай Светоний Транквилл. Жизнь двенадцати цезарей. М.: Наука, 1993. 364 с.

13. Троцкий Л. Д. Преданная революция. Что такое СССР и куда он идёт? М.: T&RUGRAM, 2017. 172 c.


Review

Views: 122


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5156 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5164 (Online)