The image of fish in Koban culture
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5164-2026-2-96-109
Abstract
Aim. The goal is to examine the features of fish images in the Koban culture.
Methodology. Images of fish on objects of various functional purposes were analyzed in different chronological periods.
Results. Based on the study of Koban culture items, it has been established that fish figures are found on weapons or as separate pendants. In the early period, fish figures are depicted on the blades, sides, and hafts of axes, while in the later period, fish are placed on the sides. Semantically, the fish is associated with the image of a predator.
Research implications. The theoretical significance of the study lies in the generalization and systematization of the material on the subject under study. The practical significance lies in the possibility of refining the dating of Koban axes, depending on the location of the fish in the compositions on their surface. A new approach to the semantics of fish images has been proposed.
About the Authors
G. N. KertsevaRussian Federation
Galina N. Kertseva – Cand. Sci. (History), Senior Researcher, Department of Archaeology
Vladikavkaz
R. Yu. Kertsev
Russian Federation
Ruslan Yu. Kertsev – employee
Vladikavkaz
References
1. Kuznetsov, B. A. (1974). Determinant of vertebrate animals of the fauna of the USSR. Part 1. Moscow: Enlightenment Publ. (in Russ.).
2. Skakov, A. Yu. (1997). On the question of the evolution of the decor of Koban-Colchis bronze axes. In: Antiquities of Eurasia. Moscow: RAS, 70–87 (in Russ.).
3. Tekhov, B. V. (1977). Central Caucasus in the 16th–10th centuries BC. Moscow:Nauka Publ. (in Russ.).
4. Belinsky, A. B. & Dudarev, S. L. (2015). Burial ground Klin-Yar III and its place among the antiquities of the Caucasus and Southeast Europe at the beginning of the early iron era. Stavropol: Design Studio B (in Russ.).
5. Uvarova, P. S. (1900). Burial grounds of the North Caucasus. Iss. 8. Moscow: Type of A. I. Mamontova Publ. (in Russ.).
6. Tekhov, B. V. (1988). Bronze axes of the Tliysky burial ground. Tbilisi: Metsniereba (in Russ.).
7. Geyusheva, T. (2010). The image of fish in the fine arts of Azerbaijan. In: Archeology, ethnology, folklore of the Caucasus. Tbilisi: Meridiani Publ., 120–123 (in Russ.).
8. Chshiev, V. T. (2023). Ancient Iranian bird dog in Caucasian metal plastic (based on materials from the Koban archaeological culture). In: Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and Political Science, 5, 111–118. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5164-2023-5-111-118 (in Russ.).
9. Kertseva, G. N. & Kertsev, R. Yu. (2022). Belt plaques "of the Isti-Su type": origin, typology, seman- tics. In: Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: History and Political Science, 5, 103–114. DOI: 10.18384/2310-676X-2022-5-103-114 (in Russ.).
10. Kertseva, G. N. & Kertsev, R. Yu. (2024). Transformation of zoomorphic images on bronze trapezoidal buckles of Koban culture. In: Bulletin of the State University of Education. History and political science series, 5, 160–164. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5164-2024-5-152-164 (in Russ.).
11. Trapsh, M. M. (2017). Trudy. Vol. 1. Inventory of the Kulanurkhva necropolis Monuments of the Bronze and Early Iron Age in Abkhazia. Sukhum: Dom Pechati Publ. (in Russ.).
12. Kantorovich, A. R. (2022). The art of the Scythian animal style of Eastern Europe: classification, typology, chronology, evolution. Vol. 2. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ. (in Russ.).
Review
JATS XML




















