The role of humanistic cooperation in Sino-Russian relations at the current stage
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5164-2024-4-127-137
Abstract
Aim. To prove and confirm the important role of Sino-Russian humanistic cooperation on the examples of thematic years and to trace promising directions of its development.
Methodology. The study is based on comparative analysis of official documents, experts’ opinions, media materials and sociological surveys of public opinion on the issues of humanistic cooperation between the Russian Federation and the PRC.
Results. Holding humanistic events, such as cultural exchanges within the Thematic Years of China and Russia, contributes to building a positive image of the states, establishing mutual trust between the peoples and developing humanistic diplomacy.
Research implications. The results of the research contribute to the study of Sino-Russian humanistic diplomacy. From the practical point of view, the results of the conducted analysis are useful in formulating effective policies for bringing peoples closer together, building positive state image and enhancing soft power.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: This research was supported by the 2021 Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation Project of the Ministry of Education of China “Research on the Evaluation Category of Chinese and Russian Political Discourse”, project no. 21YJC740055, by the 2021 Fundamental Research Project of the Liaoning Provincial Education Department “Research on the Evaluation Semantics of Chinese and Russian Media-diplomatic discourse”, project no. LJKR0420.
About the Author
Mengyuan Yin
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yin Mengyuan – Postgraduate student, Faculty of International Relations
Universitetskaya nab. 7-9, St. Petersburg 199034
References
1. Andreeva T. L., Kern K. E. [Linguistic aspect as a factor of the foreign policy of the People’s Republic of China in the 21st century]. In: Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal], 2017, no. 417, pp. 25–29.
2. Bai Xuechun, Luo Xiaoxia. [Study of Sino-Russian exchange and cooperation in higher education during Putin's rule]. In: Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i gumanitarnykh nauk [International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences], 2022, no. 5-1, pp. 200–207.
3. Naumov A. O. [Joseph Nye's concept of soft power in foreign scientific discourse: interpretation and criticism]. In: Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik [Public administration. Electronic Bulletin], 2021, no. 89, pp. 122–131.
4. Tabarintseva-Romanova K. M. [International humanitarian cooperation: foreign approaches to studying and realisation]. In: Sravnitelnaya politika [Comparative politics], 2021, no. 12, pp. 31–46.
5. Huntington S. The Clash of Civilizations (Rus. ed.: Velimeev T., Novikov Yu., transl. Stolknoveniye tsivilizatsiy. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003. 603 p.)
6. 管文虎. 试论中俄关系中的文化认同 // 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2006(S1):206-209.
7. 孙壮志. “一带一路”框架内的人文合作:成就与前景 // 欧亚经济, 2023(02):1–13+129.
8. 吴赛,张建华. “一带一路”框架下的中俄人文合作机制:特点、问题与对策 // 北京教育学院学报, 2019, 33(05):35–42.
9. 邢丽菊. 人文交流与人类命运共同体建设 // 国际问题研究, 2019(06):11–24.
10. “‘一带一路’沿线国家文化交流”课题组. 以人文交流促进与中亚的民心相通 // 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2021,41(03):43–63.
Review
Views:
74
Email this article 