Historicization of metamodernism
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2022-4-82-90
Abstract
Aim. To consider the historicization issues (substantiation of something in the form of an accomplished historical fact) in the social and humanitarian direction of metamodernism and the historical self-determination of the metamodernity cultural era.
Methodology. The analysis of the historical views correspondence in metamodernism with the theoretical sources on which they rely: the theory of cultural logics at three stages of the development of capitalism by F. Jamieson and modern versions of the modernization theory, is carried out. The historical-genetic method and the method of terminological analysis are used.
Results. The contradictions of the ideological content with the theoretical justification are revealed. The problems of using metamodernist concepts “after postmodern”, “after the end of history”, “new structure of feelings” in relation to the analysis of social causes and prerequisites of modern cultural trends are outlined.
Research implications. The theses and criticisms presented in the article may be of use to culture historians, culture experts, sociologists, and anyone interested in the latest trends in Western historical thought.
About the Author
D. I. YegorovRussian Federation
Denis I. Yegorov – Cand. Sci. (History), Independent Researcher
Moscow
References
1. Akker R. [Historicity of metamodern]. In: Acker R. Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth aſter Postmodernism (Rus. ed.: Lipka V. M., transl. Metamodernizm. Istorichnost, Affekt i Glubina posle postmodernizma. Moscow, RIPOL Klassic Publ., 2020. P. 63–66.).
2. Akker R., Vermeulen T. [Notes on “Notes on Metamodernism”]. In: Metamodern. Available at: https://metamodernizm.ru/misunderstandings-and-clarifications (accessed: 06.05.2022).
3. Akker R., Vermeulen T. [Notes on metamodernism]. In: Metamodern. Available at: https://metamodernizm.ru/notes-on-metamodernism (accessed: 05.06.2022).
4. Akker R. [Periodization of the 2000s, or the Emergence of Metamodernism]. In: Acker R. Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth aſter Postmodernism (Rus. ed.: Lipka V. M., transl. Metamodernizm. Istorichnost, Affekt i Glubina posle postmodernizma. Moscow, RIPOL Klassic Publ., 2020. P. 34–60).
5. Grebenyuk A. A. [Cultural and historical analysis of the human experiences of the era of metamodernism]. In: Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psikhologiya [Azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology], 2019, vol. 8, no. 1 (26), pp. 326–330.
6. Grebenyuk A.A. [Fundamentals of metamodern psychology]. In: Metamodern. Available at: https://metamodernizm.ru/metamodernism-psychology (accessed: 06.05.2022).
7. Kirby A. [The Death of Postmodernism and Beyond]. In: Metamodern. Available at: https://metamodernizm.ru/the-death-of-postmodernism (accessed: 06.05.2022).
8. Mitroshenkov O. A. [What will replace postmodernism?]. In: Metamodern [Metamodern]. Available at: https://metamodernizm.ru/chto-pridet-na-smenu-postmodernizmu (accessed: 06.05.2022).
9. Pavlov A.V. [Images of modernity in the twenty-first century: metamodernism]. In: Logos [Logos], 2018, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1–19.
10. Sedin A. [What is the metamodern silent about?]. In: Metamodern. Available at: https://metamodernizm.ru/about-what-is-silent-metamodern (accessed: 06.05.2022).
11. Freinacht H. [The four fields of development]. In: Metamodern. Available at: https://metamodernizm.ru/the-four-fields-of-development (accessed: 06.05.2022).
12. Schwab K. The fourth industrial revolution (Rus. ed.: Fomina E I., ed. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2022. 208 p).
Review
Views:
127
Email this article 