MIGRATION POLICY OF THE 4th GOVERNMENT OF A. MERKEL (2018–2021)
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2022-3-93-103
Abstract
Aim. To investigate and identify the essence, features and originality of the migration policy of Germany implemented by the 4th coalition government in 2018–2021.
Methodology. The article shows on specific examples how the migration policy was implemented during the specified period, what new ways, methods and conditions contributed to this, what changed in the migration process compared to the previous course. The analytical method, methods of comparison and generalization were used during the study.
Results. In the course of the study of the new migration policy of Germany, some features, important circumstances contributing to its implementation and a number of reasons and factors revealing its essence and novelty were identified.
Research implications. This work will help to deepen and better understand the importance, relevance, usefulness and prospects of the migration policy of various countries. This is truly significant in our times, since in modern conditions the migration process has become global. And human society must prepare for this.
About the Authors
N. Sheludchenko
Moscow Region State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolai P. Sheludchenko – Cand. Sci. (History), Assoc. Prof., Department of General History, Archeology and Methodology of Historical Science
141014, Moscow Region, Mytishchi, ul. Very Voloshinoi 24
A. Andreeva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna Yu. Andreeva – student
119991, Moscow, Leninsky Gory 1-51
References
1. Apanovich M. Yu. Politicheskiye aspekty migratsionnykh protsessov v sovremennoy Yevrope [Political aspects of migration processes in modern Europe]. Moscow, Aspect Press, 2018. 83 p.
2. Basov F., Vasilyev V., Kokeyev A., Khorolskaya M. [German ideas on security]. In: Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn [The International Affairs], 2018, no. 10, pp. 37–43.
3. Vedeneeva V. [Integration of refugees in Europe: employment as a priority]. In: Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya [World economy and international relations], 2019, no. 1, pp. 103–111.
4. Shayan Zh. [Germany: live together]. In: Deutschland, 2008, no. 5, pp. 43–49.
5. Zaritskii B. E. [German economy: Angela Merkel’s Heritage]. In: Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya [World economy and international relations], 2021, no. 9, pp. 34–42.
6. Zaritskii B. E. Ekonomika Germanii [Economy of Germany]. Moscow, MGIMO-University Publ., 2019. 486 p.
7. Kiyanskaya A. Zolotaya zhila migratsii [Gold mine of migration]. Moscow, Avtorskaya masterskaya: Fedotov D. A. Publ., 2018. 140 p.
8. Bade K. I. [Immigration and integration in Germany]. In: Deutschland, 2008, no. 5, pp. 50–51.
9. Malakhov V. [Germany after “migration crisis”: economy, politics, and society]. In: Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya [World economy and international relations], 2018, no. 5, pp. 41–51.
10. Nadezhdin A. E. Vliyaniye sovremennykh migratsionnykh protsessov na natsional’nuyu bezopasnost Germanii: avtoref. diss. … kand. polit. nauk [The influence of modern migration processes on the national security of Germany: abstract of Cand. Sci. thesis in Political Sciences]. Moscow, 2021. 24 p.
11. Nadezhdin A. [Criminalization of the recipient society - the result of unregulated migration. Germany case study]. In: Obozrevatel [Observer], 2018, no. 1, pp. 31–41.
12. Nadezhdin A. E. [On the current migration situation in the European Union (on the example of Germany)]. In: Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn [The International Affairs], 2020, no. 11, pp. 56–63.
13. Stepanov A. [Germany and Russia: same chancellor, same relations?]. In: Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn [The International Affairs], 2018, no. 6, pp. 48–60.
14. Sarrazin Th. Deutschland Schafft Sich (Rus. ed.: Nabatnikov T. A., transl. Germaniya: samolikvidatsiya. Moscow, Reed group Publ., 2012. 399 p.).
15. Tolmacheva A. Yu. Migratsionnyy krizis v Yevrosoyuze v 2015–2016 gg.: etnokulturnyy aspekt [Migration crisis in the European Union in 2015–2016: ethnocultural aspect]. Moscow, IEA RAN Publ., 2016. 37 p.
Review
Views:
201
Email this article 