historymgouВестник Государственного университета просвещения. Серия: История и политические наукиBulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and Political Sciences2949-51562949-5164State University of Education10.18384/2949-5164-2024-1-160-171historymgou-1820Research ArticleПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ / МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯПолитика продовольственного суверенитета в Многонациональном Государстве Боливия: причины и следствияThe food sovereignty policy in the Plurinational State of Bolivia: causes and consequencesМаловА. В.MalovA. V.

Малов Александр Вадимович – кандидат политических наук, доцент кафедры теоретической и прикладной политологии факультета международных отношений, политологии и зарубежного регионоведения Историко-архивного института

125047, г. Москва, Миусская пл., д. 6

Alexander V. Malov – Cand. Sci. (Political science), Assoc. Prof., Department of Theoretical and Applied Political Science, Faculty of International Relations and Foreign Area Studies, Institute of History and Archives

malov.pvo@gmail.comРоссийский государственный гуманитарный университетРоссияRussian State University for the HumanitiesRussian Federation20240504202401160171Copyright © Малов А.В., 20242024Малов А.В.Malov A.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.istpolitmgou.ru/jour/article/view/1820Цель

Цель. Определить особенности формирования и реализации политики продовольственного суверенитета в Многонациональном Государстве Боливия.

Процедура и методы

Процедура и методы. С помощью ретроспективного анализа были установлены причины интеграции концепции продовольственного суверенитета в конституционно-правовое поле Многонационального Государства Боливия. Опора на метод единства исторического и логического способствовала определению роли общественных движений в процессе институционализации идеи продовольственного суверенитета. С помощью метода анализа вторичных данных и институционального подхода были классифицированы официальные документы государства, определены уполномоченные органы исполнительной власти и описаны профильные программы, способствующие реализации политики продовольственного суверенитета. С помощью метода статистического наблюдения и метода визуализации зафиксирована и охарактеризована позиция Боливии в глобальном процессе производства генетически модифицированной сои.

Результаты

Результаты. По итогам исследования сделан вывод о непоследовательной траектории политики продовольственного суверенитета, характеризующейся асимметрией в землевладении, диспропорцией в социально-экономическом развитии, финансовой приоритезацией крупного агропромышленного бизнеса, монополизацией рынков сбыта, экспорто-ориентированным экстрактивизмом и нелегальным производством биотехнологических «денежных культур».

Теоретическая и/или практическая значимость. Отмечены ключевые аспекты политики продовольственного суверенитета, выявлены её сильные и слабые стороны, очерчены контуры дальнейшего развития.

Aim

Aim. To identify the features of the formation and implementation of the food sovereignty policy in the Plurinational State of Bolivia.

Methodology

Methodology. The author used a retrospective analysis to establish the reasons for the integration of the concept of food sovereignty into the legal space of the Bolivia. With the help of the method of historical and logical unity, the author determined the role of social movements in the process of institutionalization of the idea of food sovereignty. The author used the method of secondary data analysis and an institutional approach to classify official documents, identify executive authorities and describe programs that contribute to the implementation of the food sovereignty policy in the country. The position of the Bolivia in the global process of production of genetically modified soybeans was recorded and characterized by the method of statistical observation and visualization.

Results

Results. Based on the results of the study, the author concluded that the policy of food sovereignty was inconsistent, characterized by asymmetry in land ownership, disproportion in socio-economic development, financial prioritization of large agro-industrial business, monopolization of markets, export-oriented extractivism and illegal production of biotechnological cash crops.

Research implications

Research implications. The author identified the key aspects of the state’s food sovereignty policy, noted its strengths and weaknesses, outlined the contours of further development.

БоливияЛатинская Америкапродовольственный суверенитетпродовольственный режимпродовольственная безопасностьглобализациямеждународные отношениямировая политикаBoliviaLatin Americafood sovereigntyfood regimefood securityglobalizationinternational relationsworld politicsReferencesAlbу X. Suma qamaсa = convivir bien. їCуmo medirlo? In: Farah I., Vasapollo L., ed. Vivir bien: їParadigma no capitalista? La Paz, CIDES-UMSA, 2011, pp. 133–144.Albу X. Suma qamaсa = convivir bien. їCуmo medirlo? In: Farah I., Vasapollo L., ed. Vivir bien: їParadigma no capitalista? La Paz, CIDES-UMSA, 2011, pp. 133–144.Alderman J. The Houses That Evo Built: Autonomy, Vivir bien, and Viviendas in Bolivia. In: Latin American Perspectives, 2021, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 100–118.Alderman J. The Houses That Evo Built: Autonomy, Vivir bien, and Viviendas in Bolivia. In: Latin American Perspectives, 2021, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 100–118.Araъjo S. The Promise and Challenges of Food Sovereignty Policies in Latin America. In: Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, 2010, vol. 13, pp. 493–506.Araъjo S. The Promise and Challenges of Food Sovereignty Policies in Latin America. In: Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, 2010, vol. 13, pp. 493–506.Byaruhanga R., Isgren E. Rethinking the Alternatives: Food Sovereignty as a Prerequisite for Sustainable Food Security. In: Food ethics, 2023, vol. 8, no. 16, pp. 1–20.Byaruhanga R., Isgren E. Rethinking the Alternatives: Food Sovereignty as a Prerequisite for Sustainable Food Security. In: Food ethics, 2023, vol. 8, no. 16, pp. 1–20.Catacora-Vargas G., et al. Brief historical review of agroecology in Bolivia. In: Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 2017, vol. 41, no. 3-4, pp. 429–447.Catacora-Vargas G., et al. Brief historical review of agroecology in Bolivia. In: Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 2017, vol. 41, no. 3-4, pp. 429–447.Chugrov S. V., Malov A. V. Food sovereignty and education: A Japanese type of harmonization. In: RUDN Journal of Sociology, 2019, no. 4, pp. 665–677.Chugrov S. V., Malov A. V. Food sovereignty and education: A Japanese type of harmonization. In: RUDN Journal of Sociology, 2019, no. 4, pp. 665–677.Colque G., Tinta E., Sanjinйs E. Segunda reforma agraria: Una historia que incomoda. La Paz, TIERRA, 2016. 254 p.Colque G., Tinta E., Sanjinйs E. Segunda reforma agraria: Una historia que incomoda. La Paz, TIERRA, 2016. 254 p.Cуrdova Alarcуn L., Zapatta Carpio A. Soberanнa alimentaria en Ecuador y Bolivia: polнticas y normativa. In: Revista Ciencias Sociales, 2018, vol. 1, no. 39, pp. 59–72.Cуrdova Alarcуn L., Zapatta Carpio A. Soberanнa alimentaria en Ecuador y Bolivia: polнticas y normativa. In: Revista Ciencias Sociales, 2018, vol. 1, no. 39, pp. 59–72.Fabricant N. Mobilizing Bolivia’s displaced: Indigenous politics and the struggle over land. Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press, 2012. 257 p.Fabricant N. Mobilizing Bolivia’s displaced: Indigenous politics and the struggle over land. Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press, 2012. 257 p.Fabricant N. Good Living for Whom? Bolivia’s Climate Justice Movement and the Limitations of Indigenous Cosmovisions. In: Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 2013, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 159– 178.Fabricant N. Good Living for Whom? Bolivia’s Climate Justice Movement and the Limitations of Indigenous Cosmovisions. In: Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 2013, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 159– 178.Gangopadhyay A. From land wars to gas wars: Chile-Bolivia relations and globalization. In: India Quarterly, 2014, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 139–152.Gangopadhyay A. From land wars to gas wars: Chile-Bolivia relations and globalization. In: India Quarterly, 2014, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 139–152.Harvey D. The “New” Imperialism: Accumulation by dispossession. In: Socialist Register, 2004, vol. 40, pp. 63– 87.Harvey D. The “New” Imperialism: Accumulation by dispossession. In: Socialist Register, 2004, vol. 40, pp. 63– 87.Healy K. Llamas, Weavings and Organic Chocolate: Multicultural Grassroots Development in the Andes and Amazon of Bolivia. Notre Dame (IN), University of Notre Dame Press, 2001. 485 p.Healy K. Llamas, Weavings and Organic Chocolate: Multicultural Grassroots Development in the Andes and Amazon of Bolivia. Notre Dame (IN), University of Notre Dame Press, 2001. 485 p.Hecht S.B. Soybeans, Development and conservation on the Amazon Frontier. In: Development and Change, 2005, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 375–404.Hecht S.B. Soybeans, Development and conservation on the Amazon Frontier. In: Development and Change, 2005, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 375–404.Henderson С. The rise of Arab Gulf agro-capital: continuity and change in the corporate food regime. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2022, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1079–1100.Henderson С. The rise of Arab Gulf agro-capital: continuity and change in the corporate food regime. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2022, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1079–1100.Lucero J. Indigenous Political Voice and the Struggle for Recognition in Ecuador and Bolivia. In: Bebbington A., Dani A., de Haan A., Walton M., ed. Institutional Pathways to Equity. Washington, The World Bank, 2008, pp. 139–167.Lucero J. Indigenous Political Voice and the Struggle for Recognition in Ecuador and Bolivia. In: Bebbington A., Dani A., de Haan A., Walton M., ed. Institutional Pathways to Equity. Washington, The World Bank, 2008, pp. 139–167.McKay B. The politics of agrarian change in Bolivia’s soy complex. In: Journal of Agrarian Change, 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 406–424.McKay B. The politics of agrarian change in Bolivia’s soy complex. In: Journal of Agrarian Change, 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 406–424.McMichael P. Critical agrarian studies and crises of the world-historical present. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2023, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 725–757.McMichael P. Critical agrarian studies and crises of the world-historical present. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2023, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 725–757.McKay B., Nehring R., Walsh-Dilley M. The ‘state’ of food sovereignty in Latin America: political projects and alternative pathways in Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2014, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1175–1200.McKay B., Nehring R., Walsh-Dilley M. The ‘state’ of food sovereignty in Latin America: political projects and alternative pathways in Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2014, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1175–1200.Mercado G., Hjortsш C. N. Explaining the development policy implementation gap: A case of a failed food sovereignty policy in Bolivia. In: World Development, 2023, vol. 166, pp. 1–15.Mercado G., Hjortsш C. N. Explaining the development policy implementation gap: A case of a failed food sovereignty policy in Bolivia. In: World Development, 2023, vol. 166, pp. 1–15.Merino R. The Geopolitics of Food Security and Food Sovereignty in Latin America: Harmonizing Competing Visions or Reinforcing Extractive Agriculture? In: Geopolitics, 2022, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 898– 920.Merino R. The Geopolitics of Food Security and Food Sovereignty in Latin America: Harmonizing Competing Visions or Reinforcing Extractive Agriculture? In: Geopolitics, 2022, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 898– 920.Perreault T. Geographies of Neoliberalism in Latin America. In: Environment and Planning, 2005, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 191–201.Perreault T. Geographies of Neoliberalism in Latin America. In: Environment and Planning, 2005, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 191–201.Perreault T. From the Guerra del Agua to the Guerra del Gas: Resource Governance, Neoliberalism and Popular Protest in Bolivia. In: Antipode, 2006, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 150–172.Perreault T. From the Guerra del Agua to the Guerra del Gas: Resource Governance, Neoliberalism and Popular Protest in Bolivia. In: Antipode, 2006, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 150–172.Perreault T. Custom and Contradiction: Rural Water Governance and the Politics of Usos y Costumbres in Bolivia’s Irrigators’ Movement. In: Annals of the Association of American Geographer, 2008, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 834–854.Perreault T. Custom and Contradiction: Rural Water Governance and the Politics of Usos y Costumbres in Bolivia’s Irrigators’ Movement. In: Annals of the Association of American Geographer, 2008, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 834–854.Sumner J., McMurtry J., Tarhan D. Growing Community Sustenance: The Social Economy as a Route to Indigenous Food Sovereignty. In: Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 2023, vol. 14, pp. 106–121.Sumner J., McMurtry J., Tarhan D. Growing Community Sustenance: The Social Economy as a Route to Indigenous Food Sovereignty. In: Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 2023, vol. 14, pp. 106–121.Tilzey M. Authoritarian populism and neo-extractivism in Bolivia and Ecuador: the unresolved agrarian question and the prospects for food sovereignty as counter-hegemony. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2019, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 626–652.Tilzey M. Authoritarian populism and neo-extractivism in Bolivia and Ecuador: the unresolved agrarian question and the prospects for food sovereignty as counter-hegemony. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2019, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 626–652.Urioste M. Concentration and “foreignisation” of land in Bolivia. In: Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 2012, vol. 33, pp. 439–457.Urioste M. Concentration and “foreignisation” of land in Bolivia. In: Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 2012, vol. 33, pp. 439–457.Valdivia G. Agrarian Capitalism and Struggles over Hegemony in the Bolivian Lowlands. In: Latin American Perspectives, 2010, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 67–87.Valdivia G. Agrarian Capitalism and Struggles over Hegemony in the Bolivian Lowlands. In: Latin American Perspectives, 2010, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 67–87.Vera C. G., Mendoza Pinto J. El choque de dos imaginarios geopoli ticos en Bolivia. La “Guerra del Gas”. In: Revista de Estudios Transfronterizos, 2015, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 115–139.Vera C. G., Mendoza Pinto J. El choque de dos imaginarios geopoli ticos en Bolivia. La “Guerra del Gas”. In: Revista de Estudios Transfronterizos, 2015, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 115–139.Webber J. R. Red October: Left-Indigenous Struggles in Modern Bolivia. Historical Materialism Book Series. Chicago, Haymarket Books, 2012. 420 p.Webber J. R. Red October: Left-Indigenous Struggles in Modern Bolivia. Historical Materialism Book Series. Chicago, Haymarket Books, 2012. 420 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.